Search for: "of the Special Rules of Practice for the Minnesota Court of Appeals." Results 41 - 60 of 191
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Nov 2021, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit granted a temporary injunction while it considers Trump’s request to hold off any release pending appeal, and fast-tracked oral arguments for a hearing November 30. [read post]
3 Sep 2021, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
It also requests information on the companies’ communications with law enforcement regarding January 6 and the election, as well as on their reporting practices. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Supreme Court Ruling Opens Door to More Campaign Finance Challenges MSN – Karl Evers-Hillstrom (The Hill) | Published: 7/5/2021 The U.S. [read post]
17 May 2021, 1:12 pm by Dennis Crouch
In addition, HHI’s prior licensees sold licensed products in the forum state (Minnesota), but HHI did not control those sales. [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 6:48 am by Jacob Schulz, Tia Sewell
” The appeals court was similarly unmoved by an appeal from the Justice Department. [read post]
2 Apr 2021, 2:35 pm by Lundgren & Johnson, PSC
A drug lawyer looks to the relevant case law in Minnesota and from the United States Supreme Court to determine how courts view that issue. [read post]
14 Mar 2021, 8:51 am by Dave Maass
Special Operations Command, a.k.a. [read post]
11 Mar 2021, 2:33 pm by Lundgren & Johnson, PSC
Such circumstances will be rare, however, and the balance of interests must be struck with special care. [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 4:00 am by Deanne Sowter
The Court of Appeal corrected that erroneous assumption and ordered the documents be returned. [read post]
23 Oct 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Two agencies have a role in enforcing Hatch Act violations: the Justice Department, which handles criminal cases, and the Office of Special Counsel (OSC), which takes on civil violations. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 8:10 am by Scott R. Anderson
To do so, it’s developed a process rooted in overlapping statutes, congressional rules and historical practices that has somehow managed to remain relatively consistent over most of the 20th century. [read post]
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit: Intimidation of minority group members ... who wished to vote was ... a fact of life in Arizona [in the 1960s]. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
A unanimous panel of the appeals court said the individual members did not have legal standing to take the president to court. [read post]
City of Page, the Arizona Court of Appeals ruled that judges must draw all reasonable presumptions in favor of validity of an election. [read post]
25 Sep 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
As Democrats and voting rights advocates seek to lower barriers to voting during the pandemic, the Supreme Court has largely deferred to local and state officials, showing a reluctance to upend rules close to the election. [read post]
7 Aug 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit vacates a decision from a three-judge panel that ordered the case dropped. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 9:29 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Did any particular organizations make a special effort to turn their people out? [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 9:05 pm by Max Masuda-Farkas
The Legal Aid Society has since appealed the decision. [read post]