Search for: "v. Department Of Defense" Results 41 - 60 of 11,030
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2017, 10:20 am
From today's order:"Judge Watford voted to grant the petition for rehearing en banc. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 3:57 am
Alcoholism as a defense in a disciplinary actionMurolo v Safir, Appellate Division, 246 A.D.2d 653, Leave to appeal denied, 91 N.Y.2d 813In McEniry v Landi, 84 NY2d 554, the Court of Appeals said that alcoholism qualifies as a disability within the meaning of the State’s Human Rights Law [Section 292.21, Executive Law]. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 4:41 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  Neely v Felicetti 2019 NY Slip Op 08282  Decided on November 14, 2019  Appellate Division, First Department simply repeats this ancient formula. [read post]
21 Oct 2009, 5:00 am
Following the reversal of the conviction of Senator Ted Stevens for discovery violations by the Justice Department, judges, defense attorneys and prosecutors have discussed means to improve the discovery process. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 1:50 pm by ADeStefano
In Sullivan v New York Athletic Club of City of N.Y., plaintiff's knee gave out while carrying a heavy beam on his shoulder down a flight of stairs with a co-worker. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 4:00 pm
In a case decided on January 22, 2009, the Appellate Division, Third Department, affirmed the trial court’s granting of plaintiff’s motion to set aside a defense verdict, based on defense counsel’s violation of the principles of Arons v. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 1:46 pm
Department of Corrections and the opinion is here.SHAW VALENZA LLP - http://shawvalenza.com [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 9:12 am by Eric Muller
This tweet from Steve Vladeck brought to my attention that last Friday, the Defense Department submitted a brief to a military commission favorably citing and extensively quoting Hirabayashi v. [read post]
19 Mar 2007, 1:25 pm
Last week the Fourth Department issued a very interesting decision in Kish v Graham, 2007 NY Slip Op 02376. [read post]
19 Jan 2009, 1:36 am
Co., 10 AD3d 778, 780-781 (3rd Dept 2004), affd 5 NY3d 467 (2005).Although wrestlers and mixed martial arts/extreme fighters may use bear hugs in an offensive manner, injuries that result from purely defensive bear hugging are not negated by a homeowners policy's intentional acts exclusion, at least in the opinion of the Third Department. [read post]