Search for: ". OD" Results 581 - 600 of 1,528
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 May 2013, 9:28 am by Giles Peaker
He is on the following medication: Co-Codomal Tablets 2 prn 30 tablet 15. 2.2013 Diphenhydramine Hydrochloride Tablets 50 mg od 40 tablet 13.12.2011 Citaloprara Hydrobromide Tablets 40 mg od tablet 25. 2.2013 Due to the above medical condition, [IA] is finding it difficult to cope and will need help and support with his daily needs. [read post]
25 May 2013, 11:01 am by oliver randl
 This might be an indication that the OD merit their reputation of being proprietor-friendly. [read post]
20 May 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
The claims of the patent as maintained correspond to the second auxiliary request filed during the OPs before the OD. [read post]
16 May 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
At the end, the OD revoked the patent.The patent proprietor filed an appeal as well as new requests taking into account E6 and E7.It finally decided not to attend the OPs before the Board. [read post]
11 May 2013, 2:06 pm by Buce
  The "Ode to Joy," supra, works nicely. [read post]
8 May 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
This appeal was filed by the patent proprietor, a Swiss company, after the Opposition Division (OD) had revoked its patent. [read post]
5 May 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
This is a decision on an appeal filed by the opponent against the maintenance of the opposed patent in amended form.Claim 1 of the request found allowable by the Opposition Division (OD) read:1. [read post]
1 May 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
The OD, therefore, revoked the patent. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 8:35 pm
(1) http://www.newjerseynewsroom.com/state/man-sues-hillsborough-woman-for-10000-ring-in-broken-engagement-battle (2) http://family.findlaw.com/marriage/what-happens-to-the-engagement-ring-in-a-broken-engagement.html (3) http://marriage.about.com/od/rings/a/ringreturn.htm Related articlesWould You Pay For Your Own Engagement Ring? [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 1:22 pm by Adam Kolber
Yesterday, I argued for more aggressive efforts to boost the supply of cadaveric organs available for transplant: If an out-of-control trolley were heading toward a living person strapped to the tracks, we surely ought to divert it to another track, even if doing so will crush a corpse along the alternate path. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
The right to be heard had thus been granted by the OD. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 1:15 pm by Eric Alexander
  That was rejected, as was the requested rehearing, and appeal to the Office of Device Evaluation (ODE), basically because the Agency personnel determined that repairing/replacing a meniscus was different than what surgical meshes on the market did. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
Indeed, the impugned decision is silent with respect to document D25, which has been timely submitted during the opposition procedure by opponent 02 and which both the appellant and respondent 01 confirmed as having been discussed at the OPs before the OD. [read post]
14 Apr 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
In practice, the parties to the proceedings are at first the parties in regard of which the deciding organ intended to take the decision, i.e. the parties that are mentioned in the caption of the decision (see Günzel/Beckedorf in: Benkard, EPÜ, 2nd edition, A 107, marginal number 4 et seq.).What is decisive for the procedural position as party within the meaning of A 107, first sentence, is the legal situation at the moment at which the impugned decision was taken (T 631/94).[1.2.3] CPT,… [read post]
13 Apr 2013, 6:53 am
Searching the back archives of the NYT, looking for the source of devotion to this icon, I see (from last fall): Last year Toby Keith literally stumbled his way back into pop culture relevance with “Red Solo Cup,” an ode to the drinking vessel of choice for soused common folk everywhere.... [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
The patent proprietor had filed an appeal after the Opposition Division (OD) had maintained its patent in amended form. [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
The OD considers that the requirements of R 124(1) of those containing the essentials of the OPs and the relevant statements made by the parties are fulfilled. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 6:01 pm by oliver randl
The OD only cited some applicable legal provisions without taking account of all the objective facts of the present case. [read post]