Search for: "4 K & D Corporation" Results 581 - 600 of 908
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Apr 2011, 3:48 pm
(United), the creditor to whom Espinosa owed the student loan debt.[1] Id., at 34; see Rules 2002(b), (g)(2), 3015(d). [read post]
5 Feb 2023, 3:10 pm by Rob Robinson
District Court for the Southern District of Iowa (“Aérospatiale”), the Supreme Court addressed blocking statutes, holding that they “do not deprive an American court of the power to order a party subject to its jurisdiction to produce evidence even though the act of production may violate that statute,” and laid out a balancing test for courts to use in determining whether to order cross-border discovery.[3] (The factors in this balancing test are also codified in the… [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
(Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog)   US General – Decisions California state appeals court upholds Bank of America win in trade secret spat with K C Multimedia (Law360)   US General – Lawsuits and strategic steps Canon USA – Canon sues former employee for revealing trade secrets to rival Ikon Office Solutions in violation of confidentiality agreement (Law360)   US Patent Reform Patent Reform Act of 2009 introduced in Senate and House… [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 12:37 pm by Geoffrey Rapp
Roche, Congressional involvement in professional sports’ drug-testing policies: get involved but don’t infringe, 4 PHOENIX LAW REVIEW 489 (2010) Nicolas Saenz, Note, Sports franchise bankruptcy: a new way for team owners to escape league control? [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 9:00 pm by Nietzer
 These professionals can help insure that the high risk third party does not pose potential FCPA liability through the use of various means such as: checks of corporate filings and business records, legal proceedings, Internet searches, and adverse media checks. [read post]
12 May 2007, 9:00 am
We enjoyed the discussions with Kathy Thrailkill,Attenex' director of corporate marketing; and Kate Holmes, PR manager. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 2:30 pm by Howard Knopf
  Wish I’d thought of it myself ;-)Actually, Ariel Katz and I did think of it when we urged the Supreme Court of Canada to look at US law in the K-12 case and to treat any suggestion that the “three-step test” should restrict “liberal educational exceptions” in Canadian fair dealing law as a “red herring”. [read post]
24 Mar 2012, 7:01 am by Nicole Vinson
The word "firm" shall include any corporation, partnership, association, joint-stock company or individual. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 7:18 am by Jeralyn
Number 33: For the purposes of Counts 3-13, and Count 1 Racketeering Acts 3(c), 4(c), 6(d), 6(e), 6(f), 6(g), 6(h), 6(i), 6(j), 6(k), 6(l), good faith on the part of the defendant is inconsistent with intent to defraud, an element of the charges. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 9:12 am by Martin George
Review Article A review article by Sirko Harder of K Boele-Woelki, T Einhorn, D Girsberger and S Symeonides (eds), Convergence and Divergence in Private International Law: Liber Amicorum Kurt Siehr You can access this issue online and purchase individual papers. [read post]
1 Jan 2010, 4:08 am by John Watts & M. Stan Herring
In a case filed against The Brachfeld (a/k/a Brachfield) Law Group d/b/a Brachfeld & Associates, PC, a California lawfirm and collection agency, our client alleged that this debt collector violated the TCPA by making a large number of harassing illegal calls to our client's cell phone. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 9:52 pm by Kevin LaCroix
John Reed Stark As discussed in the following guest post from John Reed Stark, a recent development in the class action litigation arising out of the massive Marriott International data breach could have significant ramifications for other claimants asserting class action claims — including securities class action claims — based on data breaches or other cybersecurity incidents. [read post]
21 Jun 2008, 10:01 pm
Carr [paraphrasing]:  "How do you square  your emphasis on costs with the response to that question, which indicates that 4 out of 5 people here do not consider outside counsel cost their largest challenge? [read post]