Search for: "4th Judicial District Court" Results 581 - 600 of 1,931
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 May 2014, 12:13 pm by Michel-Adrien
Customs Court (vols. 1-70), Board of Immigration Appeals (1996-present), Federal District Courts (1924-present), and Federal Bankruptcy Courts (1 B.R. 1-present). [read post]
11 May 2010, 11:03 am by Adrian P. Thomas
” At the trial court, there was much discussion regarding In re Estate of Gay, 294 So.2d 668 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974). [read post]
25 Aug 2007, 1:41 pm
LEXIS 13010 (4th DCA August 22, 2007): The District Court for the Eastern District of New York made a similar finding in Torres v. [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 1:08 pm by Deborah Heller
The district court did not include the unarmed robbery in its calculation. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 9:30 am by Abbott & Kindermann
South Coast Air Quality Management District (2010) 48 Cal.4th 310 (“CBE”), reaching several noteworthy conclusions. [read post]
23 Nov 2022, 2:26 pm by Jon L. Gelman
The only exception to immunity is a claim for willful misconduct, which must be brought in a special three-judge federal district court. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 3:22 pm by Arthur F. Coon
In a decision filed December 2, and later ordered published on December 30, 2014, the First District Court of Appeal affirmed the Mendocino County Superior Court’s judgment denying a petition for writ of mandate challenging a Nonindustrial Timber Management Plan (NTMP) for 615 acres adjacent to Gualala. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 3:01 pm by Arthur F. Coon
“The Book” is the most widely used and judicially recognized real estate treatise in California and is cited by practicing attorneys and courts throughout the state. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 2:12 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  “The Book” is the most widely used and judicially recognized real estate treatise in California and is cited by practicing attorneys and courts throughout the state. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 4:51 pm by Arthur F. Coon
Superior Court (1973) 9 Cal.3d 626, 640), but held that even if it could be considered, the Court would still reject it:  “The trial court was not obliged to read between the lines of [CBD]’s request for judicial notice to divine an unasserted theory of relevance, and we cannot say the court abused its discretion for failing to do so. [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 1:18 pm by WIMS
" The Appeals Court cites cases from the 10th, 6th, 4th, and 7th Circuits and many Districts and says, "The reasoning of these courts is persuasive to us, as well as the broad uniformity of consensus on this issue. [read post]
9 Dec 2023, 1:30 pm by Mavrick Law Firm
Cruz, 761 So.2d 1206 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000), Florida’s Fourth District Court of Appeal explained that “[w]hen trade secret privilege is asserted as the basis for resisting production, the trial court must determine whether the requested production constitutes a trade secret; if so, the court must require the party seeking production to show reasonable necessity for the requested materials. [read post]
28 May 2012, 5:08 am by Anita Davies
 The Polish appellants’ extradition was ordered on (respectively) 28th January 2011, 2nd March 2011 and 4th March 2011. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 1:26 pm by Sheppard Mullin
Los Angeles Cellular Telephone Company, 20 Cal.4th 163 (1999) as well as the Second and Third District Courts of Appeal. [read post]