Search for: "A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST"
Results 581 - 600
of 641
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2009, 4:29 am
Dec. 4, 2008); Construction Laborers Pension Trust of Greater St Louis v. [read post]
6 Jun 2009, 2:21 pm
., DECEASED AND AS TRUSTEE OF ANY TRUST NAMED AS A LEGATEE IN THE WILL OF THOMAS J. [read post]
27 May 2009, 1:23 pm
C1777aAppeals -- Federal -- Jurisdiction -- Order remanding case to state court from which it was removed -- Federal court of appeals has jurisdiction to review district court's order remanding case to state court after declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over state-law claims under 28 U.S.C. section 1367(c) -- Such order is not a remand for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction for which appellate review is barred by sections 1447(c) and (d)Reported at 21 Fla. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 3:25 pm
: Product Liability in England & Wales General Liability Principles Product liability claims in England may be made under the Consumer Protection Act 1987 (“CPA”), in negligence or in respect of breach of contract. [read post]
5 Apr 2009, 1:26 pm
(Editor’s Note: This post is based on a client memorandum by Jonathan C. [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 2:58 pm
C. [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 1:03 pm
Shigley has extensive experience representing parties in trucking and bus accidents, products liability, catastrophic personal injury, wrongful death, brain injury, spinal cord injury and burn injury cases. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 8:59 pm
PRG-Schultz will serve as subcontractor to HealthDataInsights, Diversified Collection Services, and CGI Technologies and Solutions in Regions A, B, and D, and Viant will subcontract to Connolly Consulting in Region C. [read post]
15 Feb 2009, 2:41 am
"While we continue to believe PPG is not responsible for injuries caused by Pittsburgh Corning products, this amended plan would permanently resolve PPG's asbestos liabilities associated with Pittsburgh Corning," James C. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 6:19 am
A-C Product Liability Trust, 424 F.3d 488, 493 (6th Cir. 2005), the court observed that to hold “any exposure is a substantial cause” would render the substantial factor test “meaningless. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 6:19 am
A-C Product Liability Trust, 424 F.3d 488, 493 (6th Cir. 2005), the court observed that to hold “any exposure is a substantial cause” would render the substantial factor test “meaningless. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 6:19 am
A-C Product Liability Trust, 424 F.3d 488, 493 (6th Cir. 2005), the court observed that to hold “any exposure is a substantial cause” would render the substantial factor test “meaningless. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 9:55 am
Liability/Contributor to Negligence- Who? [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 5:14 am
That means that a suit alleging "illegal promotion" because a manufacturer of an FDA-regulated product allegedly promoted an off-label use doesn't belong in a product liability action.Ditto for the off-label promotion ban having no relation to truth or falsity. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 9:53 pm
They believe it makes the product less safe and less nutritious and wouldn’t touch it with a 10-foot pole. [read post]
9 Oct 2008, 4:28 am
P. 23(c)(4)) has always been the exception rather than the rule - again because of predominance. [read post]
29 Sep 2008, 1:00 pm
Child seat buckle defects; c. [read post]
25 Sep 2008, 7:31 pm
Honestly, would you trust reporters with sources like us? [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 1:23 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
16 Aug 2008, 2:43 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Belgium - eBay wins ruling against L’Oreal in dispute over liability for counterfeit goods sold in online auctions: (Managing Intellectual Property), (Counterfeit Chic), (IPKat), (Class 46), (Techdirt), (Ars Technica) US CAFC holds that copying free software without complying with license is copyright infringement: Robert… [read post]
