Search for: "ABERCROMBIE "
Results 581 - 600
of 945
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Aug 2011, 1:38 pm
Mike Sorrentino (no stranger to this blog and best known to us a “The Situation”) found that out recently when Abercrombie & Fitch (A&F) offered to pay Sorrentino to stop wearing the company’s clothes publicly. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 6:50 am
: "Jersey Shore: Abercrombie and Fitch Offers to Pay 'The Situation' To Stop Wearing Its Clothes" http://j.mp/qFelzu this is concerning: "Need a warrant to unmask Internet users? [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 5:44 am
Abercrombie and Fitch Offers to Pay ‘The Situation’ To Stop Wearing Its Clothes on.wsj.com/ol2ALD Spam is at a Two-Year High, Report Says bit.ly/rpN7GY Forever 21’s Suppliers Are Also Being Sued for Copyright Infringement bit.ly/qx05D2 Music Publishing Group Drops Appeal of YouTube Copyright Infringement Case bloom.bg/nlATPl Google Wants Judge to Dismiss Four Charges in Oracle Suit bit.ly/ooHXFo Minecraft maker offers to settle suit with trial by virtual combat… [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 5:03 am
It's just Jeffries' eccentric way of policing the Abercrombie brand. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 2:50 am
Merpel adds, now that 'product displacement' has hit the headlines with the reported offer of Abercrombie & Fitch to pay Jersey Shore reality show participants not to wear its products, might we also see former or fallen celebrities being paid not to use a fragrance with which the brand owner does not want them to be associated. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 11:53 am
Today’s news is that Abercrombie & Fitch is willing to pay The Situation to not wear Abercrombie clothes. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 10:46 am
Abercrombie & Fitch's effort to get people to stop buying its clothes has branched out beyond its ban on Kim Navarra. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 10:45 am
Abercrombie & Fitch strives to be an 'aspirational' brand. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 6:21 pm
Hawaii Governor Abercrombie has released the nomination for the First Circuit Court position left vacant after Associate Justice Sabrina McKenna's elevation to the Hawaii Supreme Court. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 8:20 am
Abercrombie & Fitch, 6:10cv111 (E.D. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 3:35 am
Abercrombie & Fitch Trading Co., 97 USPQ2d 1947, 1958 (9th Cir. 2011), followed that reasoning, and concluded that the two marks at issue need not be "substantial" in order for the dilution-by-blurring claim to succeed. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 12:25 pm
The conceptually strongest mark according to Abercrombie thus has the biggest risk of becoming generic. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 9:53 am
Today's edition: Thou shalt not buy clothing from Abercrombie & Fitch. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 8:18 am
McFarlane suggests that naming was part of making a character distinctive, and some courts have used copyright-like language of creativity when talking about TM and the Abercrombie spectrum: “Security Center” required only a modicum of creativity which was one reason it wasn’t strong. [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 10:36 pm
(Spicy IP) From Cola wars to Whisky wars: If anything has been ‘Made Large’, they are commercial disparagement and copyright violations (Spicy IP) Israel Israel Patent Office publishes report on 2010 activity (IP Factor) Mexico Mexican Senate votes against ACTA (Michael Geist) Netherlands Abercrombie & Fitch: trapped between Fashion Gate and Idifex before the Court of The Hague (Class 46) Nigeria Intellectual property versus the public interest:… [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 10:17 am
Abercrombie & Fitch prides itself on being a trendy brand focused on image. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 9:17 am
Abercrombie & Fitch prides itself on being a trendy brand focused on image. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 1:26 pm
Even an inadequate electronic I-9 system can be costly- employers will recall the $1m fine imposed on Abercrombie and Fitch (which had no unauthorized hires!) [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 5:01 am
Here’s the rest of what I read this week: Discrimination Cubicle Walls Closing In On ADA Violations – from Stephanie Thomas’s The Proactive Employer Blog 4 Ways Employers Skirt Discrimination Laws – from The Street Religious Discrimination Based on Abercrombie “Look Policy” – from Employment Matters Blog Changing Gears in Reverse Discrimination Claims: Differences under Michigan and Federal Law – from Michigan Employment Law… [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 4:00 am
Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc., an Oklahoma federal district court held that Abercrombie & Fitch violated Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act by refusing to hire a Muslim teenager because her religious belief requiring her to wear a headscarf violates the company's "Look Policy" for sales models. [read post]
