Search for: "ACE LTD"
Results 581 - 600
of 768
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Mar 2016, 12:11 pm
Fen Tigers Ltd (No. 2) [2014] UKSC 46, [2015] AC 106,). [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 1:29 am
Of most significance to these appeals is the Court of Appeal decision in Taylor v A Novo (UK) Ltd [2013] EWCA Civ 194) (‘Novo’) Taylor v A Novo (UK) Ltd [2013] EWCA Civ 194 (18 March 2013) (bailii.org). [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 4:10 pm
Popplewell J, referring to Lord Keith’s dictum in Attorney-General v Observer Ltd [1990] 1 AC 109 (the “Spycatcher” case), decided it was not necessary for the disclosure to cause detriment to BHAM. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 4:12 pm
Misuse of Private Information (Article 10) – That it is doubtful whether there can any Article 10 rights in relation to information concerning the claimant’s sexual behaviour, disclosure of which would contribute nothing to any debate of general interest in a democratic society: Von Hannover v Germany [2004] EMLR 21 (European Court of Human Rights), confirmed in PJS v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2016] UKSC 26, [2016] AC 1081. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 2:41 pm
[1992] 2 AC 386 and Mexfield Housing Co-operative Ltd. v Berrisford [2011] UKSC 52 as both taking the view that the LPA 1925 “seemed to underwrite the established common law position”, rather than invalidating the previous common law position on ‘hybrid’ tenancies. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 5:10 am
The ability of public bodies to bring claims in defamation In Derbyshire County Council v Times Newspapers Ltd the House of Lords held that a local authority could not bring a claim in libel in respect of its governmental and administrative functions ([1993] AC 534) Subsequent case law suggests that the ambit of the doctrine is broader and applies to agencies and companies that exercise some form of governmental function. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 4:09 pm
First, Dr Rolph identifies problems in the Lange (Lange v Australian Broadcasting Corporation (1997) 189 CLR 520) defence, noting it was not followed in Reynolds v Times Newspapers Pty Ltd [2001] 2 AC 227, a decision which the Australian courts have in turn refused to recognise, and which the High Court of Australia has declined opportunities to consider ever since, despite hinting at it in 2002: Skalkos v Assaf [2002] HCA Trans 649 (13 December 2002). [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 3:09 am
Ltd v Babco Forwarding & Shipping (UK) Ltd. [1978] AC 141 (“Buchanan”), the House of Lords decided by a 3:2 majority that the broad interpretation should be adopted. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 10:00 pm
Doody [1994] 1 AC para 531 at page 560.) [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am
Justice Sanjeev Sachdeva made an interim order against the Indian Performing Right Society (IPRS), the Phonographic Performance Ltd (PPL) and Novex Communications Pvt Ltd preventing them from contravening section 33 of India's Copyright Act, which provides that only registered societies can grant licences in respect of copyrighted work(s). [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 2:46 am
Boskalis relied on legal authorities on exclusion and limitation clauses, according to which “clarity of contractual language” is required for provisions that “restrict the rights and remedies normally available to a party” (see, inter alia, Gilbert-Ash (Northern) Ltd v Modern Engineering (Bristol) Ltd [1974] AC 689). [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 8:00 am
bit.ly/wVssl2 (Jim Eidelman) Privilege Or Work Product Waivers - bit.ly/xENsqj (Federal Evidence Review) Resolution on 'Pippins' Discovery Nears, Though Debate Continues - bit.ly/zTrmUQ (Evan Koblentz) Review Website Ordered to Close after Defaming and Harassing Lawyers - bit.ly/tV21Ex (Pinsent Masons) Singapore eDiscovery Case Update: Surface Stone Pte Ltd v Tay Seng Leon and Another [2011] SGHC 223 - bit.ly/AcLYYc (Serena Lim) Social Media Gotchas in Court - bit.ly/AlNxmG (Eric… [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 1:22 am
Ace Hardware Corp. [read post]
6 Feb 2022, 4:18 pm
Judgement was handed down in Stadler v Currys Group Ltd [2022] EWHC 160 (QB) on the 1 February 2022. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 6:07 pm
BELOW THE FOLD IS TEXT VERSION OF DATABASE OF DEBT COLLECTORS __________________________________________________________________________________ 1ST CREDIT OF AMERICA LLC 300 N ELIZABETH ST STE 220-B CHICAGO, IL 60607 6464 INVESTMENTS LLC 1625 S IRIS WY LAKEWOOD, CO 80232-6347 A COMPLETE FINANCIAL INC 2016 OGDEN ST DENVER, CO 80205 AAA COLLECTORS INC DBA TRIPLE CHECK INC 2950 N ACADEMY BLVD UNIT 201 COLORADO SPRINGS, CO 80917 Aargon Agency Inc 3160 S Valley VW STE 206 Las… [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 6:07 pm
BELOW THE FOLD IS TEXT VERSION OF DATABASE OF DEBT COLLECTORS __________________________________________________________________________________ 1ST CREDIT OF AMERICA LLC 300 N ELIZABETH ST STE 220-B CHICAGO, IL 60607 6464 INVESTMENTS LLC 1625 S IRIS WY LAKEWOOD, CO 80232-6347 A COMPLETE FINANCIAL INC 2016 OGDEN ST DENVER, CO 80205 AAA COLLECTORS INC DBA TRIPLE CHECK INC 2950 N ACADEMY BLVD UNIT 201 COLORADO SPRINGS, CO 80917 Aargon Agency Inc 3160 S Valley VW STE 206 Las… [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 1:52 am
“We are under a Constitution, but the Constitution is what the judges say it is… “-- Charles Evans Hughes, 11th Chief Justice of the United States.[1]ADNAN M L KARIMBarrister-at-Law The Supreme Court has declared the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution illegal and void ab initio; condemning military rules in explicit language[2]. [read post]
27 Nov 2018, 4:45 pm
Clark (Engineers) Ltd [1968] FSR 415 provides an example of such a case. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 4:51 pm
Cansulex Ltd [1987] 1 AC 460, i.e. that the court should retain jurisdiction of the claim unless it can be shown that there is an alternative jurisdiction in which the case may be tried more suitably for the interests of all the parties and for the ends of justice. [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 1:46 am
He also referred to various passages from case law including Lord Diplock’s observations in Fothergill v Monarch Airlines Ltd [1981] AC 251, 279: “Elementary justice or, to use the concept often cited by the European Court [of Justice], the need for legal certainty demands that the rules by which the citizen is to be bound should be ascertainable by him (or, more realistically, by a competent lawyer advising him) by reference to identifiable sources that are publicly… [read post]
