Search for: "ALL PLAINTIFFS" Results 581 - 600 of 94,801
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Mar 2018, 1:00 pm by Foran & Foran, P.A.
The court explained that generally, an “individual claim” would include all of the claims for the injury to one person, including consequential damages and derivative damages to other persons as a result of the injury. [read post]
9 Feb 2018, 5:57 am by Cecere Santana, P.A.
The dedicated team of Florida personal injury lawyers at the law firm of Cecere Santana has extensive experience representing victims and their families in all types of Florida personal injury and wrongful death cases. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 2:46 pm by McGlinchey Stafford PLLC
 The plaintiff, therefore, was not diverse from all the defendants, and diversity jurisdiction did not exist. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 11:50 am by Friedman, Rodman & Frank, P.A.
The case proceeded toward trial against all three defendants, but before reaching trial, the plaintiff entered into a settlement agreement with the city as well as the auto parts store. [read post]
  On the other hand, Rule 20, which governs joinder, provides that persons may join in one action as plaintiffs if they assert any right to relief jointly and any question of law or fact common to all plaintiffs will arise in the action. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 12:38 pm by emagraken
 Having considered all of the relevant factors, I find that the plaintiff is entitled to her costs at Scale B and disbursements, including the cost of this application. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 7:57 am by Lebowitz & Mzhen
Specifically, the city pointed to a three-year statute of limitations applicable to all cases filed against a government entity. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 11:43 am by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
” Still, less scholarly attention has been paid to whether an outrageously high request might undermine the plaintiff’s credibility, adversely affect his or her chances of winning at all. [read post]
  Yet, when all was said and done, class members did not necessarily benefit from large class action settlements, and were often left with a release of their claims in exchange for a small share of a settlement that may have had little value after accounting for attorney fees and costs. [read post]
13 Feb 2007, 9:16 am
Two of the lead plaintiffs in the BAR/BRI class action litigation are not at all pleased with their firm's proposed settlement of the lawsuit. [read post]
4 May 2012, 11:41 am by Dave
Until now, there has been a split of opinion about whether the old rules allowed you to join multiple unrelated defendants in one case by alleging that they all infringed the same patent. [read post]
1 Dec 2022, 11:11 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Along with other public comments, Mount Carmel announced that “48 nurses and pharmacists,” a group encompassing all the plaintiffs here, were “under review” and had been placed on administrative leave. [read post]
13 Aug 2016, 1:09 pm by Foran & Foran, P.A.
However, the boulevard rule, codified by statute, provides that when a driver approaches a through highway from a smaller road, the driver must yield the right of way to all traffic already in it. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 9:35 am by Lebowitz & Mzhen
The manual also instructed users to wear safety glasses at all times while using the product. [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 5:18 am by McAleer Law Firm
Experienced Georgia Injury Attorneys The Georgia personal injury attorneys at the McAleer Law Firm handle all types of claims for accident victims in the Atlanta metro area. [read post]
28 Jan 2018, 4:56 pm by Hirsch & Lyon
As a plaintiff, there are a number of ways in which you can help ensure that your case goes smoothly (from an evidence-gathering perspective). [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 6:00 am by The Law Offices of John Day, P.C.
After hearing all the evidence, the trial court found that defendant entered the intersection on a permissive light and that defendant was 75% at fault, and it assigned plaintiff 25% of the fault for the accident. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 2:56 am
Here, the majority concluded, the imposition of all expenses on a plaintiff in an ex parte proceeding, regardless of whether the plaintiff wins or loses, "does not constitute fee-shifting that implicates the American Rule but rather an unconditional compensatory charge imposed on a dissatisfied applicant who elects to engage the PTO in a district court proceeding. [read post]