Search for: "AT&T Operations Inc" Results 581 - 600 of 10,919
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
In 2011, “the Division of Corporation Finance issued interpretive guidance providing [its] views concerning operating companies’ disclosure obligations relating to cybersecurity. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 2:25 pm by Howard Knopf
SODRAC 2003 Inc., 2015 SCC 57 (CanLII), [2015] 3 SCR 615, <https://canlii.ca/t/gm8b0> namely that: [113] I find that licences fixed by the Board do not have mandatory binding force over a user; the Board has the statutory authority to fix the terms of licences pursuant to s. 70.2, but a user retains the ability to decide whether to become a licensee and operate pursuant to that licence, or to decline. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 3:57 am
Operations, Inc., Serial No. 90559208 (July 24, 2023) [precedential] (Opinion by Judge Michael B. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 3:38 am by INFORRM
” Speaking at a recent UN Human Rights Council session, Türk  talked broadly about artificial intelligence and “its potential to strengthen authoritarian governance, operate lethal autonomous weapons, or further existing systemic bias. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 10:44 am by Marcia Delgadillo
On June 6, 2023, the SEC charged Coinbase, Inc. and Coinbase Global, Inc. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 1:30 pm by Satya Marar
The efficiencies aren’t just an indicator that the merger could benefit consumers. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 4:15 am
In re MercadoLibre, Inc., Serial Nos. 88950207 and 889504201 (July 17, 2023) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Robert H. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm by ilyabeylin
Last Thursday’s split summary-judgment decision in the case that the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) brought against Ripple Labs, Inc. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 8:32 am by Eric Goldman
Abitron garnered far less attention than did other intellectual property (IP) cases argued this term, including Jack Daniels Products, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 8:00 am
District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Amarillo Division, seeking an array of monetary damages (including back pay for the impacted employee), together with injunctive relief enjoining such conduct from reoccurring.In a written statement, Brooke López, trial attorney in the EEOC’s Dallas District Office, noted, “This company operated on the false and discriminatory assumption that this employee was too old and too sick to continue to be productive through her… [read post]