Search for: "AW v. State" Results 581 - 600 of 1,165
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Dec 2014, 11:54 am by Ron Coleman
“The time for lighting the Chanukah candles is from sunset until the time that the traffic ceases in the marketplace,” states the Talmud (Shabbos 21b). [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 5:06 am
 Perhaps there has been some misunderstanding here, so I shall set out my thoughts from the beginning.As I stated above, the usual situation is that a product-by-process claim “X obtained/able by process Y” represents a novel subset of generic X. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 4:27 am by SHG
The Supreme Court will hear oral argument today in Elonis v. [read post]
27 Nov 2014, 4:08 pm
As he pointed out, if the New Jersey District Court had had to construe the 1955 agreement, it would not have applied federal common law principles: US contract law varied from state to state and there was no nationwide federal contract law available to apply. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 9:49 am by Roy Black
He won Bush v Gore and Citizens United. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 6:50 am
  At least from a defense perspective, the Lone Star State at times seemed mighty inhospitable; after all, Texas invented that awful “heeding presumption” back in 1972, touching off a Reign of Fire, as states followed suit, adopting a variety of feeding presumptions. [read post]
15 Nov 2014, 12:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
(It was said Charles V could not eat in public because of it, and “the women in portrait after portrait appear to have a sort of awful pink shoe attached to their lower faces. [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 3:45 pm by Giles Peaker
(Finally) AA v London Borough of Southwark [2014] EWHC 500 (QB) This High Court judgment is remarkable in many ways, most of them worrying. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 12:01 pm
  We would expand that last part to include any state law, but we see where that would be overreaching by the court. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 9:02 am by Steve Vladeck
Jane already flagged the merits brief filed by the U.S. government on September 17 in al Bahlul v. [read post]