Search for: "Administrative Defendants"
Results 581 - 600
of 37,053
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2024, 2:55 pm
Specifically, for the majority, “the plaintiffs must show a substantial risk that, in the near future, at least one platform will restrict the speech of at least one plaintiff in response to the actions of at least one Government defendant. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 2:01 pm
Different groups of defendants communicated with different platforms, about different topics, at different times. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 1:54 pm
Here, for every defendant, there must be at least one plaintiff with standing to seek an injunction. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 1:52 pm
They argued that the administration’s actions had violated social media users’ rights to free speech. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 12:12 pm
" In drawing this conclusion, the district court improperly weighed the facts and construed them in the light most favorable to the defendants. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 11:24 am
The court also found that “[a] drastic increase in censorship . . . directly coincided with Defendants’ public calls for censorship and private demands for censorship. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 8:46 am
Barrett said a lower court got it wrong when it 'glossed over complexities in the evidence' by attributing to the Biden administration every company decision to remove or moderate content. 'While the record reflects that the Government defendants played a role in at least some of the platforms’ moderation choices, the evidence indicates that the platforms had independent incentives to moderate content and often exercised their own judgment,' she wrote. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 8:35 am
Since Greg Lambert is on vacation, we wanted to share an episode of Future Ready Business podcast, which Greg also produces. Art Cavazos and Courtney White from Jackson Walker, LLP, interview Neil Chilson, Head of AI Policy at the Abundance Institute, and Travis Wussow, regulatory and governmental affairs lawyer Partner at JW. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 8:30 am
The five defendants above represent only a sampling of t [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 6:16 am
The Trump administration was extremely hostile to TPS. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 12:15 am
It is also hard to see how the shareholders' benefited from the company incurring the legal costs associated with defending and settling the SEC investigation. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 12:04 am
Huttner today at 303-997-1928 or contact us online to schedule a consultation and take the first step toward defending your rights and future. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 11:44 pm
Field Sobriety Test Unreliability Defense: Challenge the administration and interpretation of field sobriety tests. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 6:20 pm
It is particularly helpful where the administrative apparatus of a public or private collective seeks to guide its members toward an evolving set of expectations and behaviors. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 1:59 pm
Going forward, in the Fifth Circuit–until SCOTUS says otherwise–employers can defend against a Title VII complaint by raising a RFRA claim. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 10:57 am
Regulatory stare decisis—under which a prior administrative interpretation of an ambiguous statute is binding on future administrations under terms similar to those by which precedent is binding upon courts—would resolve these concerns nearly completely. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 7:58 am
The federal defendants now have 90 days from service on the U.S. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 6:22 am
The complaint seeks permanent injunctions, officer-and-director bars, and civil penalties from both defendants. [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 8:50 pm
While the administration claimed last year's plan was authorized by the 2003 HEROES Act, they have defended the new plan as an exercise of authority delegated by the Higher Education Act of 1965. [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 10:37 am
Nixon did not dispute the special prosecutor’s authority, leading to enduring debate on whether the Supreme Court resolved a contested issue, but every subsequent criminal defendant who tried to treat that as a source of controversy failed. [read post]
