Search for: "Alexander v. Alexander"
Results 581 - 600
of 2,825
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jun 2011, 3:45 am
” A bit more perplexing decision in Alexander v. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 11:37 am
Korematsu v. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 4:14 pm
Here's why: Alexander argues that the decision to stay his federal action conflicts with Marshall v. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 1:29 am
The board’s claim construction and motivation to combine analysis were supported by the record (Shamoon v. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 7:23 am
The court, in affirming a district court’s grant of a preliminary injunction freezing sales of the parody shoe, also found that the district court acted within its discretion in weighing the traditional likelihood of confusion factors (Vans, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Nov 2024, 6:16 am
The court found that Illinois’ absolute litigation privilege protects Toyo from liability for statements made in settling a prior trade complaint, even though those statements allegedly harmed a competitor not involved in that case (Toyo Tire Corp. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 6:31 am
As for the injunction, the Fifth Circuit agreed with Rolex that the district court should have enjoined the sale of Rolex watches with non-genuine bezels, thus affirming, as modified, the district court’s injunction in part (Rolex Watch USA, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 5:30 am
But the court, in adopting an expansive reading of a recent Supreme Court precedent, cautioned that the news publication might have a strong defense on the likelihood of confusion analysis (Punchbowl, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 8:03 am
While the Sixth Circuit largely affirmed the trial court decision, the appeals court vacated a punitive damages award of $67,650 because the district court gave improper jury instructions (House v. [read post]
23 Jan 2025, 7:34 am
Affirming a lower court’s dismissal of claims brought by a California legal technology company against its Japanese competitor over a $130 million investment round, the Ninth Circuit held that selling company equity shares does not qualify as selling goods or services under the Lanham Act (LegalForce RAPC Worldwide, PC v. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 4:25 am
Alexander Hamilton wrote in The Federalist that the judiciary would be the least dangerous branch of government. [read post]
5 Apr 2009, 9:56 pm
"In Case C-43/08 ZVS Zeitungsvertrieb Stuttgart GmbH v President of the German Patent- und Markenamt the questions asked were very similar. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 8:35 am
Belmont v Kelly Defendants’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction Belmont v Kelly Plaintiffs’ Response to Defendants’ Motion for Preliminary Injuction Belmont v Kelly Defendants’ Reply on Motion for Preliminary Injunction Link to decision coverage in The Bellingham Herald here. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 6:35 pm
Yet this line of questioning, tangential as it may seem, helped expose the Texas law for what it is: a brazen attempt to circumvent Roe v. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 6:35 pm
Yet this line of questioning, tangential as it may seem, helped expose the Texas law for what it is: a brazen attempt to circumvent Roe v. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 11:23 am
(Bankruptcy; Tribal Sovereign Immunity)United States v. [read post]
19 May 2017, 3:11 pm
The United States (Breach of Settlement Agreement)Mishewal Wappo Tribe of Alexander Valley v. [read post]
4 Oct 2007, 11:28 am
Alexander as Director of the NSA and Chief of the Central Security Service. [read post]
17 Aug 2006, 3:45 pm
Crews v. [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 8:18 am
Roth and Alexander R. [read post]
