Search for: "Amendment To the Rules Regulating the Florida Bar"
Results 581 - 600
of 765
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Aug 2012, 9:19 am
Ogden Chief Justice Marshall had written that the Clause empowered Congress to lay down the rule by which commerce (not persons in commerce) could be regulated. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 12:54 pm
© 2012 by the American Bar Association. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 8:18 am
Circuit Court ruling in that case is here. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 6:23 am
., demanding due compensation) or into participating in an illegal act or an act in contravention of valid industry regulations. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 6:23 am
., demanding due compensation) or into participating in an illegal act or an act in contravention of valid industry regulations. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 4:52 am
Joins Other States in Ruling that Cloud Computing is Ethical for Lawyers – http://bit.ly/M1U5qa (Bob Ambrogi) Nevada PI Plaintiff Claiming $61 Million in Damages Forced to Turn Over Social Media Postings – http://bit.ly/NggPRk (Adam Losey) New Ethical Rules Affecting eDiscovery in the Works - http://bit.ly/PGxu48 (Al McNee) New Jersey District Judge Upholds Sanctions for Camden County’s Grossly Negligent Litigation Hold Procedures… [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 1:07 pm
That fact undermines the US Supreme Court's past rulings (e.g., US v. [read post]
30 Jun 2012, 3:37 pm
STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. 2nd District.Criminal law -- Post conviction relief -- Timeliness of motion -- Two-year window for filing rule 3.850 commenced on date judgment and sentence became final after appellate court remanded case for resentencing -- Remand for further proceedings? [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 12:00 am
In Re: Amendments to the Florida Rules of Judicial Administration, --- So. 3d --- (Fla. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 11:47 am
STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. 1st District.Criminal law -- Trafficking in cocaine -- Habeas corpus -- Claim that section 893.13, as amended by section 893.101, is facially unconstitutional because it eliminates all mens rea from drug statute should have been raised on direct appeal or in post conviction proceedings, rather than in habeas petition -- Assuming trial court deemed habeas petition a rule 3.850 motion, trial court correctly determined it would be… [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 1:25 pm
Moreover, it continues, “[f]urther proceedings on remand . . . may provide an independent bar to petitioners’ claims. [read post]
31 May 2012, 1:38 pm
To the contrary, they are virtually unintelligible, close to the point, if not past the point, at which a statute—especially one that regulates First Amendment rights and is accompanied by substantial penalties—becomes void for vagueness. [read post]
29 May 2012, 8:24 am
Bill Provisions Status Alabama SB 33 (Constitutional Amendment) Enacts American and Alabama Laws for Alabama Courts Amendment. [read post]
25 May 2012, 7:21 pm
The state's Health and Human Services Commission initiated a rule last year barring it from contracting with entities affiliated with abortion providers.Putting the state rule on hold until he can hear full arguments in the case.Medical Devices/Patents: CORDIS TO APPEAL $40 MILLION JUDGMENT IN STENT PATENT CASE, Boston Scientific Corp. v. [read post]
9 May 2012, 1:35 pm
The Florida Bar re Amendments to Rules Regulating The Florida Bar -- Rule 4-1.8(e), 635 So.2d 968 (Fla. 1994). [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 3:23 am
Together with a Congressional bar to the DOL’s temporary non-agricultural worker wage rate rule, which DOL concedes bars that rule, no significant changes in the program are expected. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 1:13 am
Bar and the State Bar of New York. [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 3:18 pm
A segment of the general public is quick to forgive the killing of two young men in Slinger, Wisconsin and Sanford, Florida as the unavoidable consequence of the exercise of a constitutional right. [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 2:19 pm
RULING PROHIBITING ARBITRATION AGREEMENTS, Marmet Health Care Ctr. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 9:03 pm
In considering in the meantime how to resolve the legal debate, the Court appears to have no solid prior precedent that would easily guide it to a conclusion, even though it has ruled many times on Congress’s power over commerce. [read post]
