Search for: "Attorney General v. Superior Court"
Results 581 - 600
of 3,247
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Mar 2018, 4:30 am
The reason why Hassell v Bird is the type of case every US Internet Law Attorney is eagerly following is that if the California Supreme Court upholds the decision of the lower court, Section 230 will never be the same again. [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 9:37 am
Concepcion does not apply in cases brought under the Labor Code Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA). [read post]
12 May 2016, 2:50 pm
Before his appointment to the Court of Appeal, he was appointed to San Diego Superior Court in 1993 and elected in 1994. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 3:20 am
Superior Court (Standard Ins. [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 9:50 am
In Singh v. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 10:30 pm
In a recent, non-precedential (which means that it is not binding law for other courts) Pennsylvania case, D.K. v. [read post]
10 May 2016, 6:07 am
– Insurance Bad Faith, March 12, 2016, Fort Myers Injury Attorney Blog The post Nielsen v. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 6:36 am
Ruiz, Jr. was the first Hispanic attorney to argue before the United States Supreme Court in Buck v. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 8:00 am
Concepcion does not apply in cases brought under the Labor Code Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA). [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 8:42 am
Superior Court that a PAGA plaintiff need not have a class certified to proceed. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 8:07 am
As held by the Court here, the California Supreme Court’s prior finding that UCL and CLRA private attorney general claims were not arbitrable in Broughton v. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 2:59 pm
Superior Court. [read post]
5 Apr 2015, 3:52 pm
"Superior court" is defined as the Supreme Court or a County Court (see CPL 10.10 [2]). [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 9:01 pm
Three years later, the Court decided Daimler AG v. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 3:39 am
” Yesterday the court heard argument in McWilliams v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 1:24 pm
Carlisle & Jacquelin, 417 U.S. 156 (1974), and General Telephone Co. of the Southwest v. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 5:02 am
Yesterday I posted an update about the South Carolina Attorney General's lawsuit against Johnson & Johnson and how the case went to the jury for deliberation (and the link to that post is here). [read post]
6 Apr 2022, 5:00 am
However, the Pennsylvania Superior Court utilized a different rationale than that voiced by the trial court in Rush to invalidate the regular use exclusion.The Superior Court in Rush noted that the plaintiff was injured in a car accident, he was legally entitled to recover from the underinsured tortfeasors, and Erie had never obtained a 75 Pa.C.S.A. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 7:04 am
In a March 8, 2017, article, we talked about how the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals compelled the arbitration of a California Private Attorney General Act (PAGA) representative claim in Valdez v. [read post]
22 Nov 2013, 7:24 pm
According to the San Francisco Chronicle, the state’s highest court ruled in People v. [read post]
