Search for: "B. Campbell"
Results 581 - 600
of 1,265
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Sep 2022, 4:02 pm
Breaking and entering or as commonly referred to as a “B&E” offence, is criminalized under sections 348(1)-(3) of the Criminal Code. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 9:00 am
Campbell J. began by enunciating the governing test, which is that laid out in Anns v. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 5:00 am
Sugar* 0 0 0 0 0 Jerome B. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 3:46 pm
In re the Campbell Soup Company (Campbell’s Supper Bakes), Case #4038, NAD/CARU Case Reports (May/June 2003). [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 7:18 am
Nimmer & David Nimmer, Nimmer on Copyright § 13.05[B][1], p. 13-193 (2002), is not fair use.He then goes on to trash the statutory test (and the Campbell formulation) by saying:We have thus far discussed the application of the fair-use doctrine in terms of the purpose of the doctrine rather than its statutory definition, which though extensive is not illuminating.I find the Posner approach more convincing. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 7:18 am
Nimmer & David Nimmer, Nimmer on Copyright § 13.05[B][1], p. 13-193 (2002), is not fair use.He then goes on to trash the statutory test (and the Campbell formulation) by saying:We have thus far discussed the application of the fair-use doctrine in terms of the purpose of the doctrine rather than its statutory definition, which though extensive is not illuminating.I find the Posner approach more convincing. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 11:49 am
“(b) Unaccepted Offer. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 3:26 am
In this post, Sophie Campbell, as Associate in the litigation team at CMS, comments on the decision, handed down on 18 January 2023. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 2:42 pm
Campbell, 86 F. [read post]
25 May 2011, 2:08 pm
CiteID=462298Appeal from the District Court of Campbell County, the Honorable John R. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 12:28 pm
Lucas Osborn, Campbell University School of Law. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 8:32 am
B. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 2:56 pm
Traditional narratives about goodwill are flawed b/c they don’t go back before the 19th century. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 5:00 am
Could wrongly signal to authors that use of more than 10% would always be protected, but that wasn’t the 11thCircuit’s problem—held that improper even as a starting point, b/c case by case/work by work approach was required under Campbell. [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 12:23 pm
But "[b]road conclusory statements" alone are insufficient. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 7:49 am
Campbell (Campbell I), 269 N.C. [read post]
22 Nov 2020, 3:43 pm
One particular aspect is determining what exactly is in the public interest for the purpose of s. 137.1(4)(b), which is the main focus of analysis after the Court’s decision. [read post]
1 Aug 2010, 8:41 am
Thanks for reading, Jim _______________________________________ James B. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 1:56 pm
Contact Tilem & Campbell toll free at 1-877-377-8666 for a free consultation or visit www.tilemandcampbell.com. [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 6:17 am
(There is no Plan B.) [read post]
