Search for: "BARRETT v. STATE"
Results 581 - 600
of 1,941
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2024, 10:32 am
Barrett cited a common definition of standing from the majority opinion in Clapper v. [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 7:26 am
Texas, two individuals and 18 states are once again asking the Supreme Court to do what it refused to do eight years ago in National Federation of Independent Business v. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 10:54 pm
In Moore v. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm
Nonetheless, there is reason to hope that Justices Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett—who fully joined Justice Gorsuch’s opinion in Whole Woman’s Health but did not join his statement in Missouri v. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 6:02 am
”) Barrett v. [read post]
9 Aug 2024, 4:05 pm
Here is the abstract: Since the Supreme Court formally announced the arrival of the major questions doctrine in West Virginia v. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 11:48 am
(These cases, including Ramirez v. [read post]
20 Apr 2022, 6:46 am
ShareIt might not be easy to get to the merits of United States v. [read post]
25 Feb 2021, 10:18 am
Wilkinson v. [read post]
7 Jul 2018, 1:05 pm
Where as most potential Supreme Court nominees are circumspect about their views of Roe v. [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 12:14 am
State Farm appeal. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 9:30 pm
Barrett. [read post]
19 May 2022, 9:24 am
Patel v. [read post]
29 Jul 2021, 6:18 am
Here’s the Thursday morning read: Maine church asks Supreme Court to block state from enforcing Covid restrictions due to Delta (Ariane de Vogue, CNN) Roe v. [read post]
5 Mar 2025, 9:17 pm
Department of States v. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 11:28 am
New Tests from the Court Barrett’s opinion in Lindke v. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 6:03 am
Ass’n v. [read post]
5 Feb 2025, 8:26 pm
United States (1926) with Humphrey's Executor v. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 11:18 pm
Texas DPS (state sovereign immunity), and Biden v. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 4:47 pm
On the other hand, the Colorado restriction might not survive the application of United States v United Foods, Inc 533 US 405 (2001), where obligations upon fresh mushroom handlers pay assessments used primarily to fund advertisements promoting mushroom sales did not survive Central Hudson scrutiny as mediated through Glickman v Wileman Brothers & Elliott, Inc 521 US 457 (1997). [read post]