Search for: "BLAIR v. BLAIR" Results 581 - 600 of 799
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Apr 2011, 3:28 am by INFORRM
” and “Carole’s £1m question: Will she tell all about Blairs’ tax secrets? [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 3:02 am
In Ground Gilbey Ltd v Jardine Lloyd Thompson UK Ltd [2011] EWHC 124 (Comm), it was held that the imposition of a risk improvement measure by the insurer should have been brought to the attention of the assured as it could have affected the scope of insurance cover. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 10:18 am by Saf Hussain
Justice Blair held that section 31 of the 1982 Act comprehensively dealt with the recognition and enforcement of the judgments of foreign courts against states and Argentina was not entitled to claim sovereign immunity and dismissed the application. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 6:06 am
In Guangzhou Dockyards Co Ltd v ENE Aegialii [2010] EWHC 2826 (Comm), the High Court recently upheld the well-established principle that under English law, appeals against arbitral awards cannot be made on issues of fact. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 4:22 am by INFORRM
The “Daily Express” has published an apology to Cherie Blair (noted by Tabloid Watch). [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 3:46 am by Russ Bensing
  On Wednesday, I discussed the possibility of the Supreme Court accepting jurisdiction in State v. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 12:38 am
The claimant contended that its directors had acted honestly and the invoices it had submitted had been put forward only as valuations of the equipment.Mr Justice Blair held that:(1) The false invoice had not been put forward to Lombard as a valuation but as evidence of a true sale and purchase transaction. [read post]
We
14 Feb 2011, 12:00 pm by Nicholas Moline
Blair Kauffman, Yale Law School; Paul Lomio, Stanford Law School; Peter W. [read post]
We
14 Feb 2011, 12:00 pm by Nicholas Moline
Blair Kauffman, Yale Law School; Paul Lomio, Stanford Law School; Peter W. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 12:18 am
Blair J's test, based on an earlier judgment of Moore-Bick J in Mayban General Insurance v Alstom Power Plants Ltd [2004] 2 Lloyd's Rep 609, stated that if the perils of the sea in question were no more than could reasonably be expected, then inherent vice must be the proximate cause. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 8:35 am by Hull and Hull LLP
Click here for more information on the case discussed during this podcast or the citation is Blair v. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 3:07 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The second cause of action, alleging legal malpractice, is barred under the doctrine of res [*2]judicata by the court's imprimatur of a retaining lien (see Kinberg v Garr, 28 AD3d 245 [2006]; Molinaro v Bedke, 281 AD2d 242 [2001]; Summit Solomon & Feldesman v Matalon, 216 AD2d 91 [1995], lv denied 86 NY2d 711 [1995]; see generally Blair v Bartlett, 75 NY 150, 154 [1878]). [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 10:14 am by Lynne Butler
In this post, Chris Staples talks about a new case (Blair v. [read post]