Search for: "Basis International Ltd." Results 581 - 600 of 1,808
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Oct 2016, 8:30 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
In the previous post on this topic, we had given an introduction to Sasan Power Ltd. v. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 12:47 pm by Bexis
McIntyre Machinery America, Ltd., 987 A.2d 575 (N.J. 2010), deal with personal jurisdiction in product liability matters brought in state court. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 6:24 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  This change is in line with international best practices, and Schedules have been modelled on the basis of the Guidelines on Conflicts of Interest in International Arbitration, issued by the International Bar Association. [read post]
23 Feb 2020, 8:13 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
[emphasis added] The Supreme Court of Canada held in Canadian Pacific Ltd. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
What constitutes a public purpose is defined broadly and "encompasses any use which contributes to the health, safety, general welfare, convenience or prosperity of the community" (Matter of 225 Front St., Ltd. v City of Binghamton, 61 AD3d 1155, 1157 [3d Dept 2009] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; accord Matter of Johnson v Town of Caroga, 162 AD3d 1353, 1355 [3d Dept 2018]; see Matter of Court St. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
What constitutes a public purpose is defined broadly and "encompasses any use which contributes to the health, safety, general welfare, convenience or prosperity of the community" (Matter of 225 Front St., Ltd. v City of Binghamton, 61 AD3d 1155, 1157 [3d Dept 2009] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; accord Matter of Johnson v Town of Caroga, 162 AD3d 1353, 1355 [3d Dept 2018]; see Matter of Court St. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 10:26 am by Kevin LaCroix
  Fairhurst brought his motion to dismiss essentially on the basis that Caremark duties do not extend to corporate officers. [read post]
3 Jan 2022, 9:35 am by Giles Peaker
Metropolitan Housing Trust Ltd v TM (2021) EWCA Civ 1890 We saw in Taylor v Slough Borough Council (2020) EWHC 3520 (Ch) (our note) that in possession claims where a defence of breach of public sector equality duty was raised, the courts would be prepared to accept subsequent compliance (even after the issue of proceedings) as ‘remedying’ the breach. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 2:25 pm by NL
His tenancy agreement made internal decorations his responsibility. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 2:56 pm by Nikki Siesel
See our blog post entitled, How Do Intent To Use Trademark Applicants Document Their Bona Fide Intent, for more details on the types of effort the Board and the Courts expect to see when a trademark applicant indicates an intent to use basis as the filing basis. [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 7:51 pm
These fundamental divisions form part of the current international efforts to institutionalize human rights related norms on and through states and enterprises, and most notably through the U.N. [read post]
28 Nov 2019, 12:57 pm
Legal basis for this position was provided in the form of J2/04, which relates to the legal status of co-applicants in general. [read post]
22 Jul 2018, 1:41 pm by Giles Peaker
(Akerman-Livingstone v Aster Communities Ltd (formerly Flourish Homes Ltd) [2015] UKSC 15 (our note)). [read post]
10 May 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver
In the minutes of the oral proceedings the opponent is identified as SIG Technology Ltd. [read post]