Search for: "Batson v. Batson" Results 581 - 600 of 693
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 May 2016, 5:04 pm by Kate Howard
Arizona 15-8366Issue: (1) What is the proper appellate procedure to address a trial court's failure to conduct the third Batson v. [read post]
3 Dec 2008, 4:54 pm
MacShane, No. 220 SSM 40 Order of the Appellate Term is affirmed where defendant failed to meet his burden of establishing a prima facie case of discrimination under step one of the three-step protocol in Batson v Kentucky (476 US 79 [1986]). [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 1:40 pm by Aurora Barnes
Supreme Court should intervene to enforce its precedents following Batson v. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 9:18 am
The panel also ruled that an improper motive for a challenge by one attorney out of several in a multi-defendant case can be enough to violate the principle of Batson v. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 12:18 pm by John Elwood
Supreme Court should intervene to enforce its precedents following Batson v. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 11:11 am by John Elwood
Supreme Court should intervene to enforce its precedents following Batson v. [read post]
13 Feb 2011, 11:06 am by David Lat
And he told the rookie prosecutors that their mission was not to “get a competent, fair and impartial jury,” but to win.The problem with McMahon’s advice can be summed up in three words: Batson v. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 9:08 am by John Elwood
These so-called Batson claims are so fact-intensive, and the stakes in capital cases are so high, that the court routinely needs to relist them to give them careful review. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 12:45 pm by Mark Walsh
Ayala, the Court rules five to four to reverse the Ninth Circuit and hold that a trial judge’s decision to exclude a criminal defendant’s attorney from part of a Batson v. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 5:52 am by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
  New Batson Rule in Washington The Washington State Courts adopted a new rule to supplement Batson v. [read post]
9 Oct 2012, 4:27 am by Gideon
At least in CT, the prohibition is listed in the same section as that of race, raising the specter of Batson-type challenges (see, generally, State v. [read post]