Search for: "Blake v. State" Results 581 - 600 of 983
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Aug 2023, 2:21 pm by Aaron Moss
The fact that Jeff Sedlik and Kat Von D are both claiming victory post-Warhol speaks to the still-confused state of the law. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 2:21 am by INFORRM
Last week in the courts Between 27 November and 1 December 2023, Collins Rice J continued to hear the trial in the case of Blake v Fox. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 4:29 am by Russ Bensing
  Martin’s argument is that under Blakely v. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 2:24 am by INFORRM
The Panopticon blog has a post about the decision in W, X, Y and Z v Secretary of State for Health, Secretary of State for the Home Department and British Medical Association [2015] EWCA Civ 1034 concerning the sharing of medical information. [read post]
26 Nov 2008, 7:17 pm
Cunningham (2007), which struck down part of the state’s sentencing scheme, was dictated by the Court’s ruling in Blakely v. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 1:00 am by Jocelyn Hutton
The Divisional Court considered the construction of each policy wording and the FCA, the Appellant Insurers and the Hiscox Interveners appeal on a number of points On Monday 16 November, the Supreme Court will also hear the appeal of Robinson (Jamaica) v Secretary of State for Home Department. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Keefe (by his litigation friend Eyton) v Hoteles Pinero Canarias SL, heard 7 Mar 2017 Arcadia Petroleum Ltd & Ors v Bosworth & Anor, heard 10-11 Apr 2017 In the matter of an application by Anthony McIntyre for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), heard 24 October 2019 In the matter of XY (AP) (Scotland), heard 13- 14 November 2019 R v Hilton (Northern Ireland), heard 2 December 2019 MacDonald & Anor… [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 4:37 pm by INFORRM
United States The United States District Court for the Northern District of California issued its decision to grant the Center for Countering Digital Hate’s (CCDH) motion to strike out under an anti-SLAPP statute in the case of X CCDH. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 3:05 am by INFORRM
On 15 December 2023, as stated above, Fancourt J handed down judgement in favour of the claimants in the case of The Duke of Sussex and Ors v MGN Limited [2023] EWHC 3217 (Ch). [read post]
23 May 2011, 11:14 pm by Jeff Gamso
  At his sentencing before then-Judge, now Ohio Supreme Court Justice Judith Ann Lanzinger, here's what happened per the appellate court's opinion in State v. [read post]
28 Oct 2018, 5:09 pm by INFORRM
The Herald has also used the case to analyse the state of Australia as a jurisdiction for defamation litigation. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 1:45 am by INFORRM
On Wednesday 8 November 2023, there was a remote hearing in the case of Blake and others v Fox QB-2021-001248. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 5:01 am by Russ Bensing
  A scenario similar to Bullcoming’s was presented in Ohio in State v. [read post]
4 May 2020, 2:07 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (on the application of Pathan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 12 December 2019. [read post]