Search for: "Blakely v. State" Results 581 - 600 of 989
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2011, 12:04 am
Thus the decision in Siderman de Blake v. [read post]
12 May 2011, 3:39 am by Russ Bensing
As every schoolboy knows, the sentencing reforms contained in the 1996 revisions to the criminal code were pretty much trashed in State v. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 3:28 am by Russ Bensing
Another way was suggested by the 8th District last week in State v. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 10:00 pm by 1 Crown Office Row
Justice Blake considered the relevant principles to be applied in relation to the PSEDs, as summarised in R(Boyejo & Ors) v Barnett LBC and Smith v Portsmouth CC [2009] EWHC (Admin) 755. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 6:02 am by Bexis
  We, of course think that's wrong under Erie - where the default should be, if a form of liability hasn't been recognized by a state court, then it should be dismissed by a federal court applying that state's law in a diversity action.ConnecticutIn Gerrity v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 12:59 pm by Aaron Pelley
The Court found that the State’s delay of the case beyond the agreed-upon waiver of speedy sentencing until the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in Blakely v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 4:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
  Chris's discussion begins with a summary of New York law concerning marketability discount that I prepared for a post several months ago featuring the Cole v. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 6:53 am by GuestPost
In Tekle v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2009] 2 All ER 193 Blake J. found that the Article 8 rights of an asylum seeker forced to wait four years for his fresh claim to be decided and denied permission to work during this period were breached. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 5:01 am by Russ Bensing
  A scenario similar to Bullcoming’s was presented in Ohio in State v. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 10:10 am by PaulKostro
State Bank, 87 N.J. 163, 176 (1981), citing Gellert v. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 2:20 pm by Law Lady
Ambrose of the Western District of Pennsylvania said.Insurance –Coverage Dispute: 10TH CIRCUIT SAYS BAD-FAITH CLAIM NOT 'FRIVOLOUS', Blakely v. [read post]