Search for: "Block v. State"
Results 581 - 600
of 9,905
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jul 2013, 9:14 am
Controller of the State of California, LASC BC487949 Today's DJ reports that judges and justices who wish to retire early but are blocked by the anti-moonlighting rule from taking new state jobs until their terms end, have had their hopes dashed by a ruling upholding the rule. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 5:00 am
Hence, if, for the reasons I described previously, Facebook and Google are state actors when they block objectionable content, a great deal depends on what kind of forums these platforms operate. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 12:27 pm
In ProMedica Health System, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 12:20 pm
The case before the court, Manhattan Community Access Corp. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 8:58 am
Citing Buckley v. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 7:26 am
A federal district court preliminarily enjoined Executive Order 13943 seeking to kick WeChat out of the United States. [read post]
16 May 2012, 12:54 pm
United States v. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 7:28 am
Additional Resources: Withruch v. [read post]
26 Jun 2009, 5:50 am
In a previous post I erroneously stated that the appeal of Canwest Mediaworks Publications v. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 7:00 pm
Below, Stanford student Micah Block discusses Thursday’s decision in Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 4:40 pm
P. 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) by Defendants Loretta Lynch, United States Department of Justice; by Judge James L. [read post]
23 Aug 2018, 11:45 am
The state supreme court affirmed the appellate court’s reversal. [read post]
29 Nov 2024, 6:59 am
’ “To state a cause of action to recover damages for legal malpractice, “a plaintiff must allege that the attorney failed to exercise the ordinary reasonable skill and knowledge commonly possessed by a member of the legal profession and that the attorney’s breach of this duty proximately [*2]caused plaintiff to sustain actual and ascertainable damages” (Lam v Weiss, 219 AD3d 713, 716 [alterations and internal quotation marks omitted]; see… [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 4:04 am
[T]he following threshold conditions ... must be satisfied before a website blocking order is made. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 6:08 am
United States v. [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 2:07 pm
The United States agrees that the assets are not 'blocked.'" [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 1:30 pm
In its much anticipated decision in National Labor Relations Board v. [read post]
18 Jul 2024, 4:48 am
Hile v. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 7:00 am
LS3, LLC v. [read post]
15 Jul 2018, 9:01 pm
Davis v. [read post]
