Search for: "Board of Veterans Appeals" Results 581 - 600 of 1,040
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jan 2017, 12:04 pm by Edith Roberts
Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit by President George W. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 12:35 pm by Kevin Russell and Charles Davis
Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit and then worked as a private attorney until 1995. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 9:22 am by Quinta Jurecic
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces and current Chair of the American Bar Association Standing Committee on Law and National Security. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 9:44 am by Quinta Jurecic
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces and current Chair of the American Bar Association Standing Committee on Law and National Security. [read post]
27 Dec 2016, 6:41 am by Joy Waltemath
To the appeals court, the facts demonstrated that the board complied with USERRA by promptly reemploying the employee to an escalator position, with the same salary and benefits to which she would have been entitled but for her deployment. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 7:31 am by Quinta Jurecic
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces and current Chair of the American Bar Association Standing Committee on Law and National Security. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 7:35 am by Joy Waltemath
Could an appeal be heard and decided before January 20, when President Trump takes office? [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 7:54 am by Quinta Jurecic
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces and current Chair of the American Bar Association Standing Committee on Law and National Security. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 9:56 am by Quinta Jurecic
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces and current Chair of the American Bar Association Standing Committee on Law and National Security. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 1:28 pm by Sal Lo Monaco
  In turn, if the service member does not agree with the PEB decision on which conditions are considered unfitting, he or she may file an appeal with the Formal Physical Evaluation Board (FPEB) in order for the case to be reviewed. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 1:15 pm by Gary Neustadter
Sticka (In re Applebaum) (BAP 9th Cir. 2009) (Judge Markell dissenting), as have the Fourth and Sixth Circuit Courts of Appeal.) [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 9:12 am by Quinta Jurecic
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces and current Chair of the American Bar Association Standing Committee on Law and National Security. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 2:25 pm by Andrea Shannon (US)
Simon Tam, the Slants’ founder and bassist—not the lead singer, as the USPTO incorrectly represented in its brief—appealed the registration refusal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board and then the to US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 2:25 pm by Andrea Shannon (US)
Simon Tam, the Slants’ founder and bassist—not the lead singer, as the USPTO incorrectly represented in its brief—appealed the registration refusal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board and then the to US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 12:51 pm by Quinta Jurecic
Marine veteran whom they abducted in April 2015, the Times tells us. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 9:00 am by Sarah M Donnelly
Department of the Interior Administrative Judge, Interior Board of Indian Appeals, Arlington, VA. [read post]
12 Oct 2016, 6:41 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
The issue on appeal is whether a veteran preference eligible FBI employee may raise whistleblower retaliation as a defense to adverse personnel actions before the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB) The DOJ’s argues in court filings that there is “no room to doubt that Congress intended to exclude all FBI employees from MSPB review of whistleblower claims. [read post]
AB 2899 requires that any employer, before appealing a decision by the Labor Commissioner (LC) relating to a violation of wage laws, must file a bond—in favor of the unpaid employee—with the LC that covers the total amount of any minimum wages, liquidated damages, and overtime compensation owed. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 8:30 am by Eugene Volokh
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit had held (In re Tam), by a 9-to-3 vote, that the exclusion of “disparaging” marks violated the First Amendment. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 7:14 am by Steven Koprince
In a recent decision, the Civilian Board of Contract Appeals held that a SDVOSB set-aside contract obtained by misrepresenting the concern’s SDVOSB status was invalid from its inception; therefore, the prime contractor had no recourse against the government when the contract was later terminated for default. [read post]