Search for: "Brandes v. United States"
Results 581 - 600
of 2,961
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jul 2015, 4:30 am
§337(a), which provides that the United States is supposed to enforce violations of the FDCA. [read post]
3 Jan 2020, 2:34 pm
Ramos v. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 8:44 am
GmbH v. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 8:44 am
GmbH v. [read post]
8 Oct 2007, 8:24 pm
Brands and logos can be trademarked. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 5:39 am
  If you for some reason are not intimately familiar with the history of legal education in the United States, I’ll give you a little primer. [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 1:18 pm
Plaintiffs offer undisputed evidence that the President of the United States has openly and often expressed his desire to ban those of Islamic faith from entering the United States. [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 7:28 am
Veridus-v-Strategic-Complaint [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 7:37 am
Defendant has directly infringed one or more of the claims of the ‘717 Patent, including at least claims 1, 10, 16, and 25, in this judicial district and/or elsewhere in the United States. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 10:00 am
” Maggs also casts doubt on Kaspersky’s claim that it is not an FSB unit, as indicated by public filings. [read post]
30 Aug 2009, 11:29 pm
v. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 3:07 am
American University v. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 7:17 pm
Chiquita Brands International, Inc. 14-777Issue: Whether law of nations violations alleged in an Alien Tort Statute (ATS) cause of action must occur entirely within U.S. territory, as the Eleventh Circuit held in this case, or whether the ATS permits an action where a substantial nexus to the United States is present, such as U.S. nationality of the defendant and substantial relevant conduct in the United States that furthers human rights violations, as… [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 11:39 pm
In Davidoff v. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 4:39 pm
In Davidoff v. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 6:29 pm
From there, we turned to the rise of the right of publicity in the United States, A Right is Born: Celebrity, Property and Postmodern Lawmaking, by Mark Bartholomew, who explored a fascinating tension regarding the growth of the right of publicity both before and after the 1980s. [read post]
25 Aug 2019, 12:54 pm
Even though the case, Jackson v. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 11:17 am
Twitter would still permit brands and celebrities to publish (and maybe Eugene, but not me). [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 9:04 am
Merpel would not be at all surprised if this decision, which looks perfectly good to her, goes to the Court of Appeal and comes out looking somewhat different.In this dispute Flynn traded in generic medicines and speciality brands, all of which carried its FLYNN name and logo, the former being registered both as a Community trade mark and as a United Kingdom trade mark for pharmaceutical substances. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 5:47 am
As many of you no doubt have heard, the United States Supreme Court last week decided that FDA regulations applicable to generic drug manufacturers preempt state law "failure to warn" claims in PLIVA, Inc. v. [read post]
