Search for: "Bright v. State" Results 581 - 600 of 3,188
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Apr 2017, 2:18 pm by Kent Scheidegger
Bright claims during the argument that the state can hire all the experts it wants. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 4:01 pm
Nonetheless, one advantage of a bright-line rule is the lack of a need to figure out how much hitting is too much. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 1:59 pm
The Court will explore in Bartlett v. [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 2:48 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Lady Hale gave a concurring judgment in which she agreed with Lord Sumption that, given the need for a practicable and proportionate scheme, bright-line rules are necessary, and that the categories used are proportionate, save as to the two exceptions Lord Sumption identified. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 9:34 am by Hannah Buxbaum
  So jurisdiction in the case would be based not on effects within the United States -- an easier case for regulation, since U.S. investors would be involved -- but on conduct within the United States. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 2:03 pm by Joe Patrice
Defense counsel consider this a sad day for justice, but look on the bright side: your permanent vacation starts now! [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 11:23 am
Developments in the FieldSalil Tripathi, Companies, COVID-19 and Respect for Human RightsLise Smit, Claire Bright, Irene Pietropaoli, Julianne Hughes-Jennett & Peter Hood, Business Views on Mandatory Human Rights Due Diligence Regulation: A Comparative Analysis of Two Recent StudiesJelena Aparac, Business and Armed Non-State Groups: Challenging the Landscape of Corporate (Un)accountability in Armed ConflictsGabriela Quijano, Lithium Might Hold the Key to our Clean Energy… [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
On August 31, the University filed a 50-page request for review of the Regional Director's latest decision (full text), arguing not just that the Pacific Lutheran test was misapplied, but arguing also:The new test under PLU  contravenes the United States Supreme Court’s holding in  National Labor Relations Board v. [read post]