Search for: "Bush v. Person" Results 581 - 600 of 2,105
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 May 2017, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
  The answer is yes, and the Supreme Court effectively made that clear two years ago in its important ruling in Arizona Legislature v. [read post]
30 May 2017, 8:30 am by Josh Blackman
It states that, with exceptions, “no person shall receive any preference or priority or be discriminated against in the issuance of an immigrant visa because of the person’s race, sex, nationality, place of birth, or place of residence. [read post]
27 May 2017, 1:56 pm by Josh Blackman
Reading the Fourth Circuit’s en banc opinion in International Refugee Assistance Project v. [read post]
23 May 2017, 4:32 am by Guest Blogger
(Joanna Schwartz has shown in other work that indemnity functions very well today to protect state and local officials from personal liability in section 1983 litigation, just as it often operated to protect officers sued personally in the nineteenth century.) [read post]
3 May 2017, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
Like Barack Obama, who graciously chose not to investigate the war crimes of the Bush Administration, Clinton should be the bigger person and put the past behind her. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 8:33 am by Quinta Jurecic
Legally speaking, is a tweet from @realDonaldTrump, the personal account, covered by the presidential immunity articulated by the Supreme Court in Nixon v. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 9:01 pm by John Dean
Supreme Court in Clinton v. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 8:12 am by Ronald Collins
* * * In 2002, after my wife and I had sufficiently recovered from Bush v. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 3:01 am by David Meyer Lindenberg
When I was courting my wife, I volunteered that no matter how long we lived, the human voice I would recognize before that of any other person was Vin Scully’s. [read post]