Search for: "Bush v. Texas"
Results 581 - 600
of 776
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Oct 2008, 2:40 pm
: A Bush administration post-mortem (Hal Wegner) US Patents America's innovation lead looks safe, but things could change (IAM) Bessen and Meurer comparing the mortgage bubble to the patent bubble (Techdirt) Call for comments on Ex Parte Appeal Rule (Patent Docs) Fulbright & Jaworski '2008 Litigation Trends Survey' (Law360) (Law360) (Patent Prospector) (IAM) Guidance on patentee's provisional rights (Law360) Online priority document exchange… [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 8:04 am
In the final two chapters on BUSH v. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 12:12 pm
(IPKat) German Federal Supreme Court (Bundesgerichtshof) guidance regarding registrability of 'spa' in relation to beauty care products and spa services (Class 46) Europe ARMAFOAM: the ECJ rules on linguistic and changes OHIM's rules on conversion: Armacell v OHIM (CATCH US IF YOU CAN !!!) [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 11:50 am
See Wright v. [read post]
3 Oct 2008, 7:57 pm
The Court is deciding whether to review Davis' innocence claim, which would revisit a line a cases that started with the 1993 Texas case of Herrera v. [read post]
8 Sep 2008, 9:25 am
I have no doubt that, between her and McCain that Roe v. [read post]
16 Aug 2008, 2:43 am
– discussion of Washington Post article on Ismed’s efforts to promote follow-on biologics approval pathway: (Patent Baristas), (Patent Docs), US: Congressional fact-finding on follow-on biologics: (Patent Docs), US: David v Monsanto: Biotechnology patent ‘exhaustion’ after Quanta, Supreme Court petition: (Hal Wegner), US: Ulysses Pharmaceuticals announces issuance of patent for novel class of ant [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 6:59 pm
Texas), Chief Justice John Roberts wrote that President Bush did not have the authority to enforce a treaty without the permission of Congress. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 4:28 pm
Earlier coverage of Medellin v. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 4:02 pm
Earlier coverage of Medellin v. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 6:38 am
Chase, a former Treasury Secretary under Lincoln during the Civil War, for having wrongly decided Texas v. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 3:44 pm
Earlier coverage of Medellin v. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 11:53 am
President Bush personally intervened to order the state of Texas to take some action to carry out a 2004 World Court decision that called for such action because of that treaty violation. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 7:07 am
See Request for Interpretation of the Judgment of 31 March 2004 in the Case Concerning Avena and Other Mexican Nationals (Mex. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2008, 3:31 pm
Justice John Paul Stevens, who voted in March to support the Court’s ruling at that time denying President Bush the power to order Texas to remedy the treaty violation in Medellin’s case, dissented on Tuesday night. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 3:49 pm
Earlier coverage of Medellin v. [read post]
3 Aug 2008, 11:03 am
President Bush had issued a Memorandum to the Attorney General directing thatstate courts give effect to the Avena judgment. [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 3:27 pm
” If the execution goes forward now, the attorneys asserted, “Texas will effectively usurp the institutional prerogative of the federal political branches — advocated by Texas in Medellin v. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 6:36 pm
The Supreme Court said so in Furman v. [read post]
