Search for: "CALIFORNIA COMPANY v. STATE INDUSTRIAL COURT"
Results 581 - 600
of 2,409
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Aug 2024, 10:46 am
LEXIS 26 (Appeals Board noteworthy panel decision), confirms that despite the Court of Appeal’s recent decision in Zurich American Ins. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 2:47 am
Superior Court of California, 480 U.S. 102 (1987). [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 8:03 am
Samsung, 971 F.2d 1395, 1397 (9th Cir. 1992)) New York only has one system of Right of Publicity law.[5][6] The NY statutory regime supports a right of publicity, yet the New York Court of Appeals has held that there is no common law right of publicity in Stephano v. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 8:03 am
Samsung, 971 F.2d 1395, 1397 (9th Cir. 1992)) New York only has one system of Right of Publicity law.[5][6] The NY statutory regime supports a right of publicity, yet the New York Court of Appeals has held that there is no common law right of publicity in Stephano v. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 4:00 am
State of California, No. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 9:07 pm
The Appellate Court reversed, relying on Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 9:36 am
Brazil v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:15 am
Co. v. [read post]
3 May 2017, 11:03 am
District Court for Central California, Los Angeles.Fox claims their ability to name the show EMPIRE is protected by the First Amendment, ie, freedom of expression. [read post]
3 May 2017, 11:03 am
District Court for Central California, Los Angeles.Fox claims their ability to name the show EMPIRE is protected by the First Amendment, ie, freedom of expression. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 8:00 am
Emanuele Secci v. [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 8:53 am
The case of Mohawk Industries v. [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 8:53 am
The case of Mohawk Industries v. [read post]
2 May 2016, 6:21 am
It's one of the Solicitor General's tasks to represent the United States in court. [read post]
29 Sep 2021, 11:31 am
District Court for the District of Arizona issued an order in Pasqua Yaqui Tribe, et al. v. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 4:08 pm
AB 5 codifies the “ABC” test for determining independent contractor status that the California Supreme Court adopted in its 2018 decision in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 3:16 pm
The court stated, “In other words, custom or usage can serve as a common law augmentation of section 350 and 351. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 3:16 pm
The court stated, “In other words, custom or usage can serve as a common law augmentation of section 350 and 351. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 12:41 pm
Department of Industrial Relations (1989) 48 Cal.3d 341, 349. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 10:31 pm
California’s Industrial Welfare Commission (IWC) also sets forth law regarding California’s wage and hour requirements. [read post]
