Search for: "CALIFORNIA COMPANY v. STATE INDUSTRIAL COURT"
Results 581 - 600
of 2,409
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 May 2020, 4:51 pm
While the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has yet to weigh in on the FMCSA’s December 2018 Preemptive Determination with respect to California’s meal and rest period requirements under the Labor Code and Industrial Welfare Commission Wage Order 9, thus far district courts in California have upheld the FMCSA’s decision. [read post]
24 May 2020, 4:06 pm
United States Law.com had a piece “Devin Nunes’ Defamation Case Against CNN Transferred to Manhattan Federal Court”. [read post]
17 May 2020, 4:39 pm
Thomas made a submission to the House of Lords Committee on Communications and Digital’s inquiry into the future of journalism, making his comments about the industry alongside representatives from publishing companies, academics and journalists. [read post]
8 May 2020, 10:19 am
However, two recent state appellate court rulings may not bode well for punitive damages in future cases. [read post]
7 May 2020, 8:57 pm
If the entertainment market or Hollywood itself interests you, there is a federal antitrust case in the Central District of California that you should follow: William Morris Endeavor Entertainment, LLC. v. [read post]
7 May 2020, 8:02 am
Merricks v. [read post]
3 May 2020, 7:19 am
” Therefore, the Court find that Statement 2 is a non-actionable opinion. * Simoni v. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 5:00 am
This position, first articulated by the court last year in Patel v. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 5:25 pm
Given the importance of the orders to notions of federalism and the proper spheres of federal and state regulation, any decision by a Court of Appeals may find its way to the Supreme Court. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 12:22 pm
”[viii] The California Supreme Court rejected this argument reasoning that a greater than anticipated expense would not excuse the defendant. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 8:17 pm
United States v. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 1:11 pm
” CBE’s argument that the federal regulatory purpose differs from California’s failed “because the federal and state goals are identical: to protect public health and welfare. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 5:45 am
Myriad Genetics, Supreme Court of the United States, June 13, 2013, No. 12–398 [3] Alice Corporation Pty Ltd. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 2:07 pm
” The court stated that California courts may readily uphold releases of disputed wage claims, but only where “the releases [arise] from pending wage disputes or litigation where actual controversies existed between the parties. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 4:55 am
The Court stated it “finds that the delivery of Grams to the Initial Purchasers, who would resell them into the public market, represents a near certain risk of a future harm, namely the completion of a public distribution of a security without a registration statement. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 6:48 pm
California Assembly Bill (AB) 5, which Governor Gavin Newsom signed in late 2019, codified into law the landmark California Supreme Court ruling in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 4:19 pm
State Street Corporation, U.S. [read post]
10 Apr 2020, 8:55 am
In C.W. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2020, 4:16 pm
See Vesta Corp. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2020, 11:48 am
At the same time, I noted that the viral outbreak could prove a boon for other industries; among the industries I cited as a possible winner was the video teleconferencing industry. [read post]
