Search for: "CANNING et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE" Results 581 - 600 of 1,043
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Aug 2019, 5:06 am by Vishnu Kannan
Emma DiNapoli and Jacques Singer-Emery chronicled the latest developments of the military commission in United States v. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 5:42 pm by INFORRM
On 15 July 2011, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit upheld the use of full-body scanners to screen air travellers in the case of Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC), et al. v United States Department of Homeland Security, et al. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 6:48 am by Dan
 Leung Tak Lun, et al., 944 F.2d 642 (9th Cir. 1991). [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 6:35 am by Lyle Denniston
Among the cases the Court refused to review are the Duke lacrosse team scandal, involving police fabrication of evidence Evans, et al., v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
Cardozo, What Medicine Can Do for Law (1930) William O. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 12:41 pm by EPSTEIN BECKER & GREEN, P.C.
Fast et al., is likely to add further fuel to the fiery “tip credit” world,  as the high court will have to decide whether tipped employees should be paid minimum wage for nontipped tasks employees perform. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 7:27 am by Lyle Denniston
New York, et al. (10-1404) and Oneida Indian Nation, et al., v. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 4:59 am by John Elwood
Barclays Bank PLC, et al., 16-239. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 5:45 pm
Foods that have been sources of contamination include ground beef, venison, sausages, dried (non-cooked) salami, unpasteurized milk and cheese, unpasteurized apple juice and cider (Cody, et al., 1999), orange juice, alfalfa and radish sprouts (Breuer, et al., 2001), lettuce, spinach, and water (Friedman, et al., 1999). [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 5:31 am
(Laurence Kaye on Digital Media Law)   United States US General iSlate, iTablet, IP! [read post]
3 Dec 2007, 3:40 am
John Deere Co., 383 U.S. 1 (1966).5  Quanta Computer, Inc., et al. v. [read post]