Search for: "CF-3" Results 581 - 600 of 2,385
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jan 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
The applicant is referred to the fact that such a search can be carried out in the course of the examination if the deficiencies underlying a declaration pursuant to R 63 have been remedied (cf. [read post]
15 Jul 2024, 12:43 am by Eleonora Rosati
MPLC [C-723/22]The first referral (case C-723/22, commented by The IPKat here) was made by the Higher Regional Court of Munich (OLG Munich) in the proceedings between Citadines Betriebs GmbH (Citadines), the operator of a hotel, and MPLC Deutschland GmbH (MPLC), an independent collecting society.The proceedings concern an alleged infringement by Citadines of the exclusive right of communication to the public that MPLC holds over an episode of a television series broadcast on a public television… [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Similarly, the passage on page 5, lines 3-6, which describes a “preferred embodiment” of the invention, is not sufficient to establish that other means for supplying power were considered. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
J 20/85 [4(a)] and J 3/90). [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
In fact, the board observes that neither before the EPO acting as IPEA in the international phase nor before the EPO ED in the regional phase did the applicant raise the issue of the missing pages or request a correction of the filing date (cf. [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 8:02 am by Nico Cordes
The first question in this appeal case is whether the present application fulfils the EPC language requirements for divisional applications.3. [read post]
31 May 2015, 5:02 am
" The last sentence of paragraph 3 Page 3 states that the Report will focus particularly on the copyright element for "reasons as explained below" but then fails to provide any reasons. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 5:50 am by Diane Tweedlie
The non-existence of a non-disclosure agreement does not therefore have to be proven in the opposition.3. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 5:01 pm by oliver
The additional limitation, in the same paragraph, according to which “no pair of adjacent segments defines a larger straight segment” does not necessarily imply that the segments, as such, are straight but appears to specify, in the case that these segments are indeed straight, that they cannot be associated so as to define a longer straight segment (cf. point 3.1 above). [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 11:57 am by Brian Shiffrin
Almeda, 189 Conn. 303, 455 A.2d 1326; cf. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
As such, the record fully supports the ALJ's finding, adopted by the Board, that "claimant failed to provide any documentation substantiating that she was advised by a doctor or medical [*3]professional to not get the COVID-19 vaccine. [read post]
23 Dec 2016, 4:24 am by Nico Cordes
Another known goal of the transformation was to achieve better color separation in the transformed color space, for instance, for emphasizing the change of the tint of a subject's skin.The board does not find this argument persuasive since the claims must in principle be clear in themselves when read by the person skilled in the art (cf. [read post]