Search for: "CHANCELLOR v. CHANCELLOR"
Results 581 - 600
of 2,431
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2020, 8:51 am
And Hilary Beckles, the vice-chancellor of the University of the West Indies and a chairman at the CARICOM Reparations Commission, writes about how the 21st century will know no greater global movement than the reparations movement. [read post]
21 May 2020, 1:46 am
Access to legal aid remains limited - https://atjf.org.uk/In the momentous case of Unison v The Lord Chancellor [2017] UKSC 51 (the tribunal fees case) Lord Reed explained why this is so important – “Courts exist in order to ensure that the laws made by Parliament, and the common law created by the courts themselves, are applied and enforced. [read post]
18 May 2020, 5:03 pm
” Switzer v. [read post]
16 May 2020, 12:46 pm
” He used Chancellor Andre Bouchard’s 2018 Almond v. [read post]
11 May 2020, 1:58 pm
Argument 1 – was the Practice Direction ultra vires (outside the powers of the Master of the Rolls and Lord Chancellor to make). [read post]
10 May 2020, 7:25 pm
Bielousov v. [read post]
5 May 2020, 2:47 pm
However, in two 2019 rulings – the Marchand v. [read post]
[David Bernstein] What Motivated the Supreme Court's pre-New Deal Liberty of Contract Jurisprudence?
4 May 2020, 1:17 pm
Howard Gillman, author of a leading book on Lochner and currently Chancellor of UC Irvine, responds here. [read post]
2 May 2020, 7:03 pm
Vice Chancellor Joseph R. [read post]
1 May 2020, 3:05 am
Now, earlier this week the Delaware Court of Chancery issued a 41-page opinion in Hughes v. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 9:30 am
Noting that a subpoena ad testificandum will be quashed only where the futility of the process to uncover anything legitimate is inevitable or obvious or where the information sought is utterly irrelevant to any proper inquiry, the Appellate Division, citing Kapon v Koch, 23 NY3d at page 39, said that the party moving to quash bears "the burden of establishing that the subpoena should be [quashed] under such circumstances. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 9:30 am
Noting that a subpoena ad testificandum will be quashed only where the futility of the process to uncover anything legitimate is inevitable or obvious or where the information sought is utterly irrelevant to any proper inquiry, the Appellate Division, citing Kapon v Koch, 23 NY3d at page 39, said that the party moving to quash bears "the burden of establishing that the subpoena should be [quashed] under such circumstances. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 5:42 pm
Fund v. [read post]
25 Apr 2020, 1:51 pm
Servs., LLC v. [read post]
25 Apr 2020, 7:37 am
Vice Chancellor Glasscock found evidence that several high-ranking Nuveen bond specialists warned Goldman Sachs, Deutsche Bank and J.P. [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 4:12 pm
A couple of decades later, in Jacobson v. [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 6:00 am
In a recent Court of Chancery opinion in David Shabbouei v. [read post]
12 Apr 2020, 6:39 pm
Background This precise issue was addressed in the recent decision of SolarReserve CSP Holdings LLC v. [read post]
12 Apr 2020, 5:34 am
From Delaware Vice Chancellor Glasscock in Thursday's Preston Hollow Capital LLC v. [read post]
