Search for: "CROSS v. COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA" Results 581 - 600 of 1,765
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Aug 2011, 5:31 am by Russ Bensing
US - After Davis lost his motion to suppress and was convicted, and while his case was on appeal, the Supreme Court handed down Arizona v. [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 4:32 pm by INFORRM
On 13 and 14 November 2018 Supreme Court heard the appeal in the crucial “serious harm” case of Lachaux v Independent Print Limited. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 12:07 pm by Eric Goldman
The court says “California and federal courts are in accord that actions that, like the instant case, seek relief based on an internet service provider’s decisions whether to publish, edit, or withdraw particular postings are barred by Section 230” (cites to Cross v. [read post]
5 Sep 2007, 9:38 am
When last we checked, Molski/Frankovich were appealing a federal judge's finding in Molski v. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 12:52 pm by Florian Mueller
Koh of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California to grant a conventional antisuit injunction, even though there would actually be valid policy reasons to do so.On two other occasions, this blog accurately predicted antisuit injunctions barring patent holders from the overseas enforcement of SEP injunctions: Microsoft v. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 7:22 am by Jon Sands
The 9th granted the government's cross appeal for forfeiture, holding that a jury verdict was not required for the money seizure. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 8:52 am by Arthur F. Coon
The Litigation And The Court of Appeal’s Opinion The CEQA litigation challenging the project EIR (which took 3 years to produce) consisted of three writ petitions, consolidated for hearing, making numerous challenges that were resolved by the trial court’s extensive written decision and judgment, which the Court of Appeal affirmed as stated above. [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 10:09 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Online stalking and threats are hot topics today, especially in light of the Supreme Court granting cert in US v. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 4:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
  The district court denied the motion, but certified the questions to the Ninth Circuit, which granted permission to appeal. [read post]
28 May 2019, 3:22 am by Edith Roberts
Amy Howe reports for this blog, in a post that first appeared at Howe on the Court, that on Friday the Supreme Court granted a request by Republican legislators in Ohio and Michigan “to put lower court rulings that found partisan gerrymandering in those states on hold while they appeal. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 2:53 pm by Jon Sands
This didn't accurately convey the substance of the Miranda warnings, see California v. [read post]