Search for: "CROSS v. COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA"
Results 581 - 600
of 1,765
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Feb 2018, 7:30 am
Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit, in Berman v. [read post]
11 Feb 2018, 9:01 pm
The US Supreme Court heard argument last month in McCoy v. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 11:38 am
Barring an appeal to the California Supreme Court, the Ninth Circuit’s decision brings this dolphin tale to a close. [read post]
30 Jan 2018, 1:27 pm
It dismissed the City's cross-complaint, saying that the present suit was just about the City's water usage, not everyone else's.Thankfully, the Court of Appeal reverses.I get that the plaintiff might be happy with just an easier suit that's only against one appropriator. [read post]
26 Jan 2018, 5:46 pm
Supreme Court case Riley v. [read post]
EFF Asks Ninth Circuit Appeals Court To Strengthen Privacy Protections Of Smart Phones At The Border
19 Jan 2018, 3:20 pm
The case, U.S. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2018, 4:42 pm
Attorneys in California. [read post]
14 Jan 2018, 4:55 am
Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit held that a striking employee couldn’t be disciplined for yelling racist terms at a bus full of replacement workers as they crossed the picket line. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 9:58 am
Cisco lost the first round in a California district court, but it’s hoping for a better outcome from the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 8:17 am
Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit earlier this year. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 5:08 pm
Of even greater significance, and as of the same date, there are 50 Trump administration nominations to federal court judgeships awaiting Senate action, including seven for the Courts of Appeals and 43 for the District Courts. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 8:00 am
So that the Court retains said jurisdiction, Plaintiff agrees to and shall make this request to the Court prior to filing the request for dismissal of the action.A recent appellate opinion in Shaunak v Sayta, issued by the First Appellate District Court of Appeal in California (Case No. [read post]
31 Dec 2017, 4:00 am
LEXIS 4974 (CT Super., Nov. 28, 2017), a Connecticut trial court dismissed an inmate's complaints that his religious oils and his gold chain and cross were placed in temporary storage; however the court allowed him to move ahead on his claim that his oils were wrongly classified as contraband.In Kollock v. [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 6:41 pm
District Court for the Central District of California released its long-awaited Memorandum of Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law in TCL Communications v. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 1:12 pm
District Court for the Southern District of California (Case No. 14CV1865 AJB JMA) alleging trademark infringement and false designation of origin. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 3:54 pm
Supreme Court’s 2014 decision in Riley v. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 10:38 am
For instance, in Davis v. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 11:12 am
California does not apply and neither does the 9th Cir’s decision in US v. [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 11:35 am
So it may be with the Fourth District Court of Appeal’s 43-page, published, 2-1 majority decision, accompanied by a 4-page dissent, filed on November 16, 2017, after remand from the California Supreme Court in Cleveland National Forest Foundation, et al. v. [read post]
21 Nov 2017, 11:23 am
The district court declined to follow Asadi v. [read post]
