Search for: "California v. Texas" Results 581 - 600 of 4,040
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Dec 2008, 4:27 am
Toy manufacturer Mattel, Inc. will pay $12 million to 39 states (including New York, Texas and Florida) to settle an investigation over lead-painted toys made in China and sold in the USA, according to the Associated Press, Environment News Service and John Bisnar of California Injury Blog. [read post]
2 May 2019, 5:42 am by Charles Sartain
The Bill is in response to the 2018 ruling of the Supreme Court of Texas in ConocoPhillips Company et al v. [read post]
16 Jul 2007, 5:14 am
California, 386 U.S. 58, 61-62 (1967) (holding that, when a vehicle is seized for forfeiture purposes, a warrantless inventory search can be made); United States v. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 11:37 am by Tom Goldstein
Perry, the challenge to California’s Proposition 8, and United States v. [read post]
25 May 2012, 8:08 am by Gritsforbreakfast
"Solitary confinement has been universally condemned by courts in the juvenile justice system," said Barry Krisberg, president of the California-based National Council on Crime and Delinquency, and a member of the task force in Texas that last year recommended TYC reforms. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 3:35 am by Amy Howe
Texas, in which the Court will consider whether the state used the correct standard to determine whether death-row inmate Bobby James Moore is too intellectually disabled to be executed, and Buck v. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 5:47 am by Amy Howe
In less than a week, the Court will hear oral arguments in Friedrichs v. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
In a new Cato podcast, I talk with Caleb Brown about the Court’s pending case on “disparate impact” liability in housing and finance, Texas Dept. of Housing vs. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 9:19 am by Maureen Johnston
Texas 14-292Issue: (1) Whether the former Texas special issues for death penalty sentencing do provide – as the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals held – or do not provide – as the Fifth Circuit has held – an appropriate vehicle for the jury to consider and give full effect to mitigating evidence of good character, such that failure to provide a separate question violates the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments under this Court’s jurisprudence in… [read post]