Search for: "Carter v. State"
Results 581 - 600
of 1,942
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jan 2018, 2:00 am
United States and Collins v. [read post]
31 Dec 2017, 10:36 am
By Marty Lederman and David LubanThis coming Friday, the Supreme Court Justices are scheduled to consider, at conference, the government’s nominal “petition for certiorari” in No. 17-654, Hargan v. [read post]
28 Dec 2017, 4:08 pm
A slander trial in which the claimant was successful and was awarded damages of £35,000 Pannu v Carter [2017] EWHC 3270 (QB) (Sir David Eady). [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 9:30 am
Circuit in Narenji v. [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 9:30 am
The court supported this argument with a citation to United States v. [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 9:39 pm
In three recent posts, I've sharply criticized briefs filed by the Department of Justice--and by the Solicitor General, in particular--in the various iterations of the Hargan v. [read post]
17 Dec 2017, 4:16 pm
On 15 December 2017 judgment was handed down on behalf of Sir David Eady in the case of Pannu v Carter. [read post]
16 Dec 2017, 4:55 am
After several weeks, United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 10:00 am
Knauff v. [read post]
10 Dec 2017, 4:18 pm
United States The Guardian reports on a hearing of a motion by President Trump to dismiss a libel action by former Apprentice contestant, Summer Zervos. [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 10:29 am
Carter v. [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 10:29 am
Carter v. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 11:00 am
The Supreme Court noted in Noel Canning v. [read post]
3 Dec 2017, 4:04 pm
The defamation trial in Pannu v Carter was heard on 28 and 29 November 2017 by Sir David Eady Judgment was reserved. [read post]
2 Dec 2017, 2:16 pm
See United States v. [read post]
26 Nov 2017, 4:39 pm
Coenen, University of Georgia Law School Next Week in the Courts On 28 November 2017 the defamation trial in Pannu v Carter will begin. [read post]
21 Nov 2017, 8:20 am
For instance, in Carter v. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 10:42 am
Carter v. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 4:25 am
The legal malpractice case is first dismissed: “Plaintiff’s claim for legal malpractice in connection with an underlying settlement fails to state a cause of action in the absence of allegations that the “settlement . . . was effectively compelled by the mistakes of [defendant] counsel” (Bernstein v Oppenheim & Co., 160 AD2d 428, 430 [1st Dept 1990]) or the result of fraud or coercion (see Beattie v Brown & Wood, 243 AD2d 395 [1st Dept… [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 1:02 pm
Carter concluded that “the real property at issue was transferred in fee simple absolute, and the portion of the devise attempting to restrict the alienability of the property is void and of no effect as being repugnant to the devise and the public policy of this State. [read post]
