Search for: "Chancellor v. State"
Results 581 - 600
of 1,369
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Sep 2016, 5:43 am
In the decision of Chrome Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Sep 2016, 12:40 am
In its much awaited judgment in the Delhi University photocopying case (The Chancellor Masters and Scholars of the University of Oxford v. [read post]
20 Sep 2016, 7:43 pm
Commentary: This opinion should be read together with the opinion by Vice Chancellor-by-Designation LeGrow which was published within a few days of this decision in the matter of Bizzari v. [read post]
19 Sep 2016, 3:32 am
While I’m not aware of any New York cases directly addressing the issue, a recent decision by Chancellor Ellen Hobbs Lyle of the Tennessee Business Court in Wilford v Coltea, Case No. 15-856-BC [Tenn. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 3:24 am
The transcript decision by Vice Chancellor Tamika Montgomery-Reeves in Harrison v Quivus Systems, LLC, C.A. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 5:24 am
The recent decision by Vice Chancellor Montgomery-Reeves in the case of Grand Acquisition LLC v. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 12:31 pm
Hasen is Chancellor’s Professor of Law and Political Science at the University of California, Irvine. [read post]
18 Aug 2016, 6:33 am
In the recent decision of Diamond State Tire, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Aug 2016, 8:37 am
This rationale was subsequently followed in Louisiana Municipal Employees’ Retirement System v. [read post]
13 Aug 2016, 2:28 pm
In the recent decision of Melbourne Municipal Firefighters’ Pension Trust Fund v. [read post]
13 Aug 2016, 12:37 pm
In the recent decision of In Kraft v. [read post]
13 Aug 2016, 11:05 am
That issue was addressed in the recent decision of Pogue v. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 4:55 pm
The first of the two recent cases, Pulier v. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 10:07 am
"Rembar details the fascinating case of Ashford v. [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 2:21 am
Judgment has now been handed down in R (Public Law Project) v Lord Chancellor [2016] UKSC 39, in which Regulations made under the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 (LASPO) were challenged. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 1:54 pm
Consider, for example, Riggs v. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 7:23 am
Question: Based on your extensive research, do you think that Bob Woodward and Scott Armstrong’s major take-away points (beyond United States v. [read post]
4 Jul 2016, 1:45 am
R (Public Law Project) v The Lord Chancellor, heard 18 April 2016. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 7:51 pm
John O’Toole writes: In Obeid v. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 6:48 am
In the recent opinion by Vice Chancellor Glasscock, The Williams Companies, Inc. v. [read post]