Search for: "Chapman v. Chapman" Results 581 - 600 of 970
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jan 2012, 11:21 am by Kit Molloy
The cases of R V Secretary of State for Social Security ex p Taylor and Chapman [1997] BPIR 505 where it was held that deductions can continue to be made between the making of a bankruptcy order and the bankrupt’s discharge from bankruptcy were said to be wrongly decided. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 11:21 am by Kit Molloy
The cases of R V Secretary of State for Social Security ex p Taylor and Chapman [1997] BPIR 505 where it was held that deductions can continue to be made between the making of a bankruptcy order and the bankrupt’s discharge from bankruptcy were said to be wrongly decided. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
The “News of the World” took centre stage at the Leveson Inquiry last week, with evidence from former NoW journalists Mazher Mahmood, Neil Wallis, Neville Thurlbeck, Colin Myler and Daniel Sanderson, lawyers Lawrence Abramson (formerly of Harbottle & Lewis) and Julian Pike (of Farrer & Co), former NoW in-house lawyers Tom Crone and Jon Chapman, and the private investigator Derek Webb. [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 2:31 am by SHG
Chapman, 524 F.3d 1073 (9th Cir. 2008). [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 2:42 am by SHG
Boring-o.The post discusses the issue framed in Vasquez v. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 4:30 pm by Benjamin Wittes
Alas, Brigadier General Mark Martins, now the chief prosecutor of the military commissions, can’t blog for Lawfare any more, as he did when he was in the field in Afghanistan. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 12:54 pm
Michael Matthews and Andrea Kendrick, both from Chapman, Popik & White. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 1:00 pm by Paul Caron
Lang (Chapman) presents Conflicts about Conflicts: Implications of the Tax Court Canal Corp Decision for Disciplinary and Malpractice Actions at San Diego today as part of its Tax Law Speaker Series: The presentation will discuss the implications of the holding in Canal Corporation v. [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 5:33 am by INFORRM
  This point was considered in the case of Howlett v Holding ([2006] EWHC 41 (QB)). [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 9:30 am by ipelton
The Board cited the recent meeting and orders in Blackhorse .v Pro Football, Inc. [read post]