Search for: "Childs v. Gross"
Results 581 - 600
of 874
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Nov 2011, 7:38 am
Bringing us to the Appellate Division's newly unreported decision in Livingstone v. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 5:01 am
Now, an alert reader has pointed out to me that the issue raised in the hypothetical was addressed by the Tax Court in a Summary Opinion in July of this year, Abdi v. [read post]
13 Nov 2011, 4:57 pm
In Pamela T. v. [read post]
13 Nov 2011, 4:57 pm
In Pamela T. v. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 8:31 am
Moreover, the parties' prorated shares of child care expenses and future reasonable unreimbursed health care expenses deviated from the CSSA guidelines, since they were not calculated based upon the parties' "gross (total) income as should have been or should be reported in the most recent federal income tax return" (Domestic Relations Law 240[1-b][b][5][I]; 240 [1-b][c][1]). [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 3:38 am
Relying on the Supreme Court’s 1975 decision in State v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 8:07 am
L. 107-16, title V, Sec. 532(c)(15), (d), title IX, Sec. 901, June 7, 2001, 115 Stat. 75, 150, temporarily struck out item 2604 “Credit for certain State taxes”. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 11:29 pm
It held that the Support Magistrate properly ordered child support based on the needs of the child, since respondent presented insufficient evidence to determine her gross income ( Family Court Act 413[1][k]). [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 10:22 am
State v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:32 pm
” In G.S. v. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 7:02 am
Plaintiff's 2010 federal income tax return reported adjusted gross income of $109,896. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 3:33 am
In determining a payor spouse's gross income in analyzing an appropriate level of alimony or child support, one question that arises on occasion is whether to include so-called "mandatory" contributions to the total number. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 3:08 am
The parent's right to custody is not absolute, however.The presumption in favor of the parent will be overcome by "a showing of gross misconduct, unfitness, neglect, or 'exceptional circumstances' affecting the welfare of the child[.] [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 4:38 am
” Mr Place draws my attention to the evidence of CAFCASS Chief Exec Anthony Douglas at the Parliamentary Public Accounts and Justice Committees, and the case of A County Council v K & Ors (By the Child’s Guardian Ht) [2011] EWHC 1672 (Fam) (04 July 2011) (brief blog post here), which for him are evidence that problems persist. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 1:00 am
Resource: Wetzel v. [read post]
10 Sep 2011, 1:00 am
Wetzel v. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 3:47 am
Bezak, State v. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 7:00 am
Last month the New Jersey Supreme Court in Dept of Children & Families, Div. of Youth & Family Servs. v. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 4:24 am
Yesterday, in State v. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 3:29 am
It’s based on what I consider a gross misreading of SCOTUS’ decision a few years ago in Herring v. [read post]
