Search for: "Chin v. State"
Results 581 - 600
of 716
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Oct 2009, 7:58 am
United States v. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 3:26 pm
In his deposition in the case at hand, Stern v. [read post]
29 Sep 2009, 9:14 pm
The parties to the Authors’ Guild et al. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 2:34 pm
Judge Chin's order stated: "Under all the circumstances, it makes no sense to conduct a hearing on the fairness and reasonableness of the current settlement agreement, as it does not appear that the current settlement will be the operative one". [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 12:34 am
The plaintiffs in the case of Betty Nestlehutt and Bruce Nestlehutt v. [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 7:40 pm
” Authors’ Guild v. [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 3:46 pm
Stern v. [read post]
14 Aug 2009, 8:46 am
District Judge Denny Chin has ruled in Stern v. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 6:37 am
The importance of the parties' ties and affection is illustrated in the opinion released by the Third District in Chin v. [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 1:15 pm
Public's Right of AccessThe intersection of these competing issues is the subject of a notable decision by Judge Chin on the disclosure of victims' emails he received prior to Madoff's guilty plea, United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 12:55 pm
"Sealing of Sentencing Documents Relating to Defendant's CooperationIn United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 5:30 am
He recommends filing a state court action to challenge the California Supreme Court's holding, under Strauss v. [read post]
26 May 2009, 1:42 pm
The California Supreme Court ruled today in Strauss v. [read post]
26 May 2009, 10:53 am
In Strauss v. [read post]
25 May 2009, 2:48 am
She faults these arguments for their (unintended) consequences, just as she faults the effect on impoverished women of the limitations of the privacy argument for Roe v. [read post]
20 May 2009, 12:28 pm
Fingers clasped tightly beneath their chin. [read post]
10 May 2009, 2:01 pm
Kaplan, a lawyer for the plaintiffs in Hernandez v. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 3:31 am
During the Prop. 8 oral arguments, Justice Ming Chin had asked Kenneth Starr whether the proposal would provide equal protection to same-sex couples, and whether the Court could order it. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 11:45 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2009, 5:52 pm
And yet actual facts and law presented at the conference didn't really support this position: California Associate Justice Ming Chin's presentation on Johnson v. [read post]
