Search for: "Christopher v. United States" Results 581 - 600 of 1,655
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 May 2017, 3:36 pm by Shea Denning
The United States Supreme Court vacated the Ninth Circuit’s judgment in Mendez yesterday, rejecting, in a unanimous opinion, the Ninth Circuit’s provocation rule as incompatible with the high court’s excessive force jurisprudence. [read post]
27 Jan 2018, 6:43 am by William Ford
United States or permitted by its ruling in Munaf v. [read post]
18 May 2012, 12:55 pm by Marcia Coyle
The United States opposed the judges’ petition for rehearing en banc. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 11:13 am by Robert Chesney
Holder that continues the slow dismantling of the United States No Fly List. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 2:00 am
United States (drug felony, misdemeanor, facilitate, cellular phone) Dean, Christopher M. v. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 5:30 am
 The Court explained that a computer database is a business record when the data was entered into the computer in the regular course of business, and United States v. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 11:16 am by Jordan Brunner
The United States and South Korea have agreed not to hold joint military exercises during the Olympics, the Wall Street Journal informs us. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 4:55 am by SHG
In a delightfully titled post that gets the joke backwards,* Pigs get fed, hogs get slaughtered [sic],  Judge Richard Kopf poses the question that arose in the Third Circuit opinion in United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 7:44 am by Hannah Kris
United States in the Trump v. [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 11:20 am by J. Michael Goodson Law Library
The Supreme Court's June 2013 ruling on U.S. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 2:51 am by Thomas Musmann
In response to the invalidation of its Canadian patents, Eli Lilly commenced international investment arbitration against Canada under Chapter 11 (Investment) of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) of 1994 between Canada, the United States, and Mexico. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 4:09 am by Daniel Walters
As many had already speculated, the court reads the cumulative effect of cases like Christopher v. [read post]
22 May 2015, 12:26 pm
They include: (1) Nonnon v City of New York;2 (2) Simpson v City of New York;3 (3) Irizarry v City of New York;4 (4) Carollo v City of New York;5 (5) Walsh v City of New York;6 (6) Arisio v City of New York;7 (7) Parmigiano v City of New York;8 (8) Phillips v City of New York;9 and (9) Nessen v City of New York.10 There were 29 plaintiffs in the original nine actions. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 7:50 am by Kali Borkoski
Petition for certiorari Brief for the United States Petitioner's reply (forthcoming) Vasquez v. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 10:58 am by Dan Ernst
Byrd Center for Legislative StudiesMicki Kaufman, CUNY Graduate Center, “Everything on Paper Will Be Used Against Me: Quantifying Kissinger”Billy Wayson, “Making Sense of Digital Information Using Qualitative Analysis SoftwareTom Faith, Office of the Historian, Department of State, “Mapping the Foreign Relations of the United States Series”James Wyatt, Robert C. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 6:57 am
  The court continued, noting that,[a]t the outset, we note the First Amendment to the United States Constitution guarantees freedom of the press and the Sixth Amendment guarantees a public trial by an impartial jury. [read post]