Search for: "Clear v. United States of America" Results 581 - 600 of 2,645
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 May 2017, 1:56 pm by Josh Blackman
Reading the Fourth Circuit’s en banc opinion in International Refugee Assistance Project v. [read post]
22 Jul 2016, 7:55 pm
By 2008 U.S. courts deemed the area to be under de facto sovereignty of the United States (Boumediene v. [read post]
15 Feb 2007, 12:25 am
United States, 649 A.2d 301, 308 (D.C. 1994); Carson v. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 7:26 am by Medicare Set Aside Services
And for anyone interested in the opinion that sparked my attention today:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ex rel. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 4:04 am by rhapsodyinbooks
When is “clear and present danger” adequate justification for an increase in police power by the state? [read post]
6 Feb 2022, 1:30 pm
’’ Despite the choice of law provision, George Frank unilaterally added the following language at the end of paragraph 19: ‘‘Since this is a contract for an agreement taking place in the state of Connecticut, Connecticut laws will supersede those of California. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 6:17 am by A. Benjamin Spencer
Mazda Motor of America Inc.: By providing a choice in safety features, federal regulations do not automatically preempt state tort claims against manufacturers.Honorable Mentions: Thompson v. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 11:34 am by pgbarnes
  How many know that this is the direct result of the Court’s 5-4 decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 7:08 am by LTA-Editor
Currently, this may be HBO’s best option for reducing the rate of piracy of its programs in the United States; the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit recently ruled that the United States International Trade Commission (ITC) does not have the authority to prosecute foreign websites that contain pirated content in ClearCorrect Operating, LLC v. [read post]
1 Jun 2022, 11:49 am by Eric Goldman
Also, court-watchers have called out Justice Alito’s possibly inconsistent votes on using the shadow docket to pre-clear state laws. [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 9:06 pm by Lyle Denniston
 That is the case, now usually called United States v. [read post]
16 Jul 2008, 8:59 am
United States of America);The Associated Press says one of the 51 Mexican prisoners was scheduled to be executed in less than three weeks.The next step isn't clear, as the Supreme Court ruled earlier thisyear that President Bush doesn't have the authority to order stategovernments to comply with edicts from the World Court. [read post]