Search for: "Cloud v. State" Results 581 - 600 of 1,742
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Feb 2018, 12:49 pm by William Ford
Andrew Keane Woods and Peter Swire argued that the CLOUD Act could solve the regulatory problem of which country’s law enforcement officials should be able to access Internet data in the cloud. [read post]
7 May 2015, 3:40 pm by Cindy Cohn and Hanni Fakhoury
While your phone’s capabilities are distinctly modern, a new decision in United States v. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 4:26 am by Edith Roberts
The first is Weyerhaeuser Company v. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 9:27 am by Florian Mueller
OK, some antitrust enforcement accelerated its adoption--but that's precisely what is needed against Apple's single-browser-engine policy now.The 2020 United States et al. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 10:10 am
  On that basis, Biomet seeks a judgment under the Declaratory Judgment Act, stating that an actual and justiciable controversy exists. [read post]
20 Aug 2015, 10:00 am by Dan Ernst
This welcome development dispelled a distorted vision of the past that held the potential to cloud clear thinking in facing the problems of the future, including those posed by the struggle against terrorism. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 2:55 am
Heasley).The TTAB has (almost always) followed the principle laid down by the CAFC in Herbko v. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 11:10 am by Karen Gullo
"For the brief:https://www.eff.org/document/van-buren-eff-security-researchers-amicus-briefFor bios of security researchers who signed the brief:https://www.eff.org/cases/van-buren-v-united-states/security-researcher-amiciFor more about CFAA reform:https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2013/01/these-are-critical-fixes-computer-fraud-and-abuse-act Contact:  AndrewCrockerSenior Staff Attorneyandrew@eff.org NaomiGilensFrank Stanton Fellownaomi@eff.org [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 11:09 am by Vishnu Kannan
Circuit’s ruling in Qassim v. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 9:19 am by Rahul Bhagnari, ACLU
It seems that they were persuaded by a 2010 appellate court decision (a case called United States v. [read post]