Search for: "Com. v. Laws" Results 581 - 600 of 2,402
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 May 2012, 3:21 am by Russ Bensing
  This is a confusing area of law, and the opinion does not serve to clarify it. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 3:47 am by Russ Bensing
  Given the the decision in Michigan v. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 7:35 am
On Article 3(c), after an exhaustive review of the case law under Article 3(c), including referring to the Explanatory Memorandum (COM (90) 101 final), the judge concluded that:Article 3(c) precludes the grant of SPCs for a combination of active ingredients where one of those active ingredients embodies the "core inventive advance" (at [30] of Actavis v Sanofi) or "sole subject-matter of the invention" (at [39] of Actavis v Boehringer) of the… [read post]
14 Jun 2007, 7:31 pm by Martin
" Please RSVP with Andy by tomorrow at andyc [at] biaw [dot] com. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 3:56 am
  In State v. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 3:50 am
The result in State v. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 3:45 am by Russ Bensing
  The oral argument before the US Supreme Court on Tuesday in McDonald v. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 3:41 am
 That's pretty much hornbook law. [read post]