Search for: "Cooper v. Smith" Results 581 - 600 of 741
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Another example would be the understanding of the concept of jurisdiction which we finally resolved in Smith and Ellis (Smith & Ors v The Ministry of Defence [2013] UKSC 41). [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 6:25 am
(IP Dragon)   Colombia Legal victory for Coca Cola over trade mark (IP tango)   Denmark Danish Supreme Court affirms decision forcing food stall operator using ORIENTEXPRESSEN to change her trade mark (Class 46)   Europe Questions on acquiescence for ECJ in Budejovicky Budvar Narodni Podnik v Anheuser-Busch Inc (Class 46) (IPKat) EWHC questions referred to ECJ in L'Oréal SA v eBay now available on Curia (Class 46) Disruptive innovations:… [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am by Ben
Bradley Cooper who pushed the button? [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 9:03 am by Ronald Collins
This work explains how Field instead saw both these competing conceptions of liberty as legitimate and in fact believed that the two cooperated toward a common end. [read post]
3 May 2014, 8:56 am by Schachtman
See generally Matthias Egger, George Davey Smith, and Douglas Altman, Systematic Reviews in Health Care: Meta-Analysis in Context (2001). [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
Whether that’s explaining how we’re thinking about penalties, disgorgement and remedies; highlighting enforcement initiatives; discussing legal developments; or outlining the many ways in which we are encouraging and rewarding cooperation; this type of dialogue benefits all of us. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 4:00 am by Jessica Clogg
Canada (Attorney General) and Coastal GasLink Pipeline Ltd v Huson. [read post]
4 Mar 2012, 1:27 am by admin
In 1970, the Supreme Court decided Greenbelt Cooperative Publishing Assn., Inc. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 4:28 pm by INFORRM
Cybereagle’s Graham Smith gives his reaction to the report here. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 6:00 pm
Signature Financial Group, Inc., and AT&T Corp. v. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 7:16 pm
Officers had reason to believe that their informant was truthful and that his tip was reliable where: 1) the informant was under arrest on a possessory offense and had every incentive to cooperate with the police; 2) he believed that his phone calls to arrange a drug deal with Defendant were being recorded; and 3) every bit of information that he provided was quickly borne out by actual events. [read post]