Search for: "Cost v. Cost"
Results 581 - 600
of 48,936
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Nov 2009, 9:30 pm
In today's case (Mohamadi v. [read post]
2 Jul 2007, 3:12 pm
In Case C-331/05 P Internationaler Hilfsfonds eV v. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 5:36 am
The particular decision, York University v. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 8:53 pm
However, the court referenced a 2016 decision (David v. [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 1:20 pm
" Louisiana v. [read post]
15 Apr 2012, 6:02 pm
Magistrate Judge Thynge recently reviewed a bill of costs in Cordance Corp. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 4:36 pm
(v) in the absence of a good reason to make any other order the fall back is to make no order as to costs. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 4:36 pm
(v) in the absence of a good reason to make any other order the fall back is to make no order as to costs. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 5:03 am
Santam Limited v Selby Panel & Paint (Pty) Ltd High Court of South Africa, Gauteng Local Division, Johannesburg, case no 5540/2022 (15 June 2023 [read post]
1 Feb 2014, 6:03 am
She also issued an injunction barring further unlawful screenings.She ordered Mr Luxton to pay £65,000 in legal costs, pending final assessment of sum he owes, with estimates putting the final sum as anything up to £125,000 - with one report saying the Judge exclaimed ""Goodness me" on hearing the League's costs bill.http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-south-west-wales-25968200 and some earlier wise words on what might happen after the MPS v… [read post]
13 May 2010, 4:00 am
With the Smith v. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 5:21 pm
Duane Morris Takeaways: On March 25, 2024, the California Court of Appeal for the Second District held in Gramajo v. [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 9:18 pm
I order that the plaintiff is entitled to costs under Appendix B at Scale B. [read post]
5 Dec 2015, 10:34 am
Arnold v Britton [2015] UKSC 36; Philips v Francis [2014] EWCA Civ 1395; and, Assethold Ltd v Watts [2014] UKUT 537 (LC). [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 7:21 am
In last week’s case (Piper v. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 3:48 am
Some useful guidance can be found in the case of Dymocks Franchise Systems (NSW) Pty v Todd in 2004. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 3:48 am
It is known as a Third Party Costs Order, and the relevant authority is Section 51 of the Senior Courts Act 1981 and Part 46.2 of the Civil Procedure Rules.Some useful guidance can be found in the case of Dymocks Franchise Systems (NSW) Pty v Todd in 2004.Although a Third Party Costs order should only be made in exceptional circumstances, this means no more than outside the ordinary run of cases where parties pursue or defend claims for their own benefit and at their own… [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 8:22 am
In that appeal the Times contends that the costs order is an unjustified interference with its Article 10 and Article 6 rights. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 1:34 pm
Berry, 2 Ohio St.2d 169, 207 N.E.2d 545; Snyder v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 5:59 am
Summary: It is not often that the courts deal with charity related cases but this latest decision of Justice Beaudoin 2011 ONSC 6801 (CANLII) and 2011 ONSC 5684 (CANLII), confirms that when it comes to costs; the same rules apply. [read post]
