Search for: "Cross v. Cross" Results 581 - 600 of 24,100
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Feb 2024, 1:45 am by INFORRM
China Recent developments in the Shanghai Pilot Free Trade Zone to facilitate cross-border data transfers are expected to provide greater flexibility in exporting data from China, which has been stymied by the Cyberspace Administration of China’s strict cross-border data transfer regulations proposed in December 2023. [read post]
18 Feb 2024, 5:29 pm by Franklin C. McRoberts
The Appeal In her cross-appellant’s brief, Dvir argued that the jury already “sanctioned” him enough with the “requirement that he return the fruits of his conduct. [read post]
18 Feb 2024, 6:45 am by Chukwuma Okoli
Nonetheless, Cases like Terre Neuve Sarl v Yewdale Ltd [2020] and Etihad Airways PJSC v Flother [2020] reveal complexities in ascertaining commercial expectations and business efficacy. [read post]
17 Feb 2024, 3:41 am by jonathanturley
Indeed, he may have already crossed over in the effort to swat back investigations into corruption allegations. [read post]
Authors: Ray Giblett, James Morris, Rajaee Rouhani, Stephen Lee, Jeremy Moller, Charles Nugent-Young, Merren Taylor, Timothy Chan, Joshua Kan, Dylan Sault and Steven Li  Welcome to our first wrap up of the year! [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:22 am by centerforartlaw
(Accent Delight), an offshore company with Dmitry Rybolovlev as the ultimate beneficial owner, v. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 1:16 am by Chukwuma Okoli
The Supreme Court’s decision in Roberts v Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen and Families Association considered this issue in the context of the common law choice of law rules. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 3:44 pm by Michael Lowe
There are lots of names for people crossing the border into Texas without authority, including migrants, immigrants, illegals, undocumented noncitizens, illegal entrants. [read post]
10 Feb 2024, 4:24 am by Alessandro Cerri
 Further, Noah Clothing's allegation of infringement of its right to be heard, on the basis that it had not been provided with the opportunity to comment on the late-submitted evidence, was also rejected by the Court, finding that Noah Clothing has indeed been able to comment on such evidence in its observations on the appeal and cross-appeal. [read post]