Search for: "Cross v. Powers" Results 581 - 600 of 4,888
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Nov 2022, 5:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Citing Matter of United Fedn. of Teachers, Local 2, AFT, AFL-CIO v Board of Educ. of City School Dist. of City of N.Y., 1 NY3d 72, the Appellate Division sustained Supreme Court's ruling, explaining that: 1. [read post]
23 Nov 2022, 5:04 pm
Cross-over hybridity: one of the most interesting provisions of the Report's recommendations was the suggestion that the World Bank adopt  human rights due diligence reporting. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 10:42 am by Trachtman
Given the WTO’s convening power, it can be expected that the deliberations of that Committee will be influential. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 2:18 am by INFORRM
The bill proposes to introduce new provisions to deal with threats to national security from espionage, sabotage and persons acting for foreign powers. [read post]
18 Nov 2022, 11:00 am by admin
More specifically, the government has identified the following seven “main pillars” of the Competition Act that may warrant amendment: (i) potentially harmful mergers (e.g., the current operation of the efficiencies defence under section 92 of the Competition Act); (ii) abuse of dominance (e.g., with regard to large online platforms); (iii) competitor collaborations; (iv) effects on labour; (v) impacts of new technology on deceptive marketing; (vi) the Competition Bureau’s… [read post]
17 Nov 2022, 10:57 pm by INFORRM
As a result, journalists, which work increasingly on cross-border projects and provide their services to cross-border audiences, and by extension providers of media services, are likely to face barriers, legal uncertainty and uneven conditions of competition. [read post]
17 Nov 2022, 12:00 am by Thalia Kruger
In practice, ex lege powers of representation may be the subject of cooperation between the authorities of Contracting Parties (notably as provided for under Chapter V), but, where the issue arises of the existence, the extent and the exercise of such powers, the courts and other authorities of Contracting States will rely on their own law, including, where appropriate, their conflict-of-laws rules. [read post]
16 Nov 2022, 4:16 am by Emma Snell
  NASA launched its most powerful rocket ever yesterday. [read post]
15 Nov 2022, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
(Straightforward all-Republican-ruled states cannot on their own guarantee enough electoral votes to lock in a win for their candidate, and Vice President Harris will obviously not try to push beyond the boundary that even Mike Pence would not cross.) [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 4:00 am by Guest Author
In particular, Shane endorses a broad theory of the Commerce Clause power under which Congress can legislate on virtually any “national problem” (134) citing in support a passage from Gibbons v. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 9:04 pm by Jeffrey Lubbers
Justice Robert Jackson famously described the Act four years later in the case of Wang Yang Sung v. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 11:00 pm by Daniel Jin
There are 26 federative states (and the federal district) in Brazil, each of which have the powers to adopt their own Constitutions and laws, subject to the rules and principles provided for under the Federal Constitution. [read post]
2 Nov 2022, 9:23 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
In response to the recent Equal Protection challenge to ICWA by a small number of states in Haaland v. [read post]
1 Nov 2022, 4:00 am by Deanne Sowter
McLellan v Birbilis In McLellan v Birbilis, 2021 ONSC 7084, Justice Nicole Tellier debunked (again!) [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 11:40 pm by Josh Blackman
I've now had a chance to review the oral argument in the Students for Fair Admission v. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 4:58 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In the civil context, the claim “accrues when the malpractice is committed” (Ruggiero v Powers, 284 AD2d 593, 594 [3d Dept 2001], lv dismissed 97 NY2d 638 [2001]), “not at the time that the injury is discovered” (Lavelle-Tomko v Aswad & Ingraham, 191 AD3d 1142, 1143 [3d Dept 2021]; see McCoy v Feinman, 99 NY2d 295, 301 [2002]). [read post]