Search for: "DOES 1-121"
Results 581 - 600
of 1,229
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Sep 2015, 1:30 pm
These tags also violated the integrity of the work, and thus violated Amish Kapoor’s moral rights over the sculpture, as protected by article L. 121-1 of the French Intellectual Property Code, under which the author has the perpetual right to respect for his work. [read post]
5 Sep 2015, 6:38 am
It noted that Congress did put a special rule in Section 1038(e) that provides if a principal residence is reaquired, and then is resold within 1 year thereafter, the original Section 121 exclusion will continue to apply. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 4:02 pm
In response to qualified privilege, CPAA sought, in terms of section 19(1) of the Act, to defeat qualified privilege on the basis that the defendant “took improper advantage of the occasion of publication” – a quasi-malice finding. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 6:07 am
But it does present the government with a series of conundrums, especially relating to its own internal operations. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 6:00 am
In other words, section 121(1)(c) is not designed to stop improper transactions (which is the core of the bribery provision). [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 10:01 pm
The report does not indicate what the company did to result in the penalty. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 3:00 am
The Court pointed out that § 29-26-121 “does not provide a penalty for noncompliance,” and that Tennessee Rule of Civil Procedure 41.01 states that a plaintiff “shall have the right to take a voluntarily nonsuit…at any time before the trial of a cause,” so long as a motion for summary judgment made by the adverse party is not pending. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 2:11 pm
Before Justices Lang and Brown[1]. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 2:11 pm
Before Justices Lang and Brown[1]. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 2:26 pm
Lago Vista, 532 U.S. 318, 121 S. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 7:17 am
(California Code of Civil Procedure § 425.16(b)(1).) [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 5:08 pm
Fields (2004) 121 Cal.App.4th 1543, 1548. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 3:09 am
§ 29-26-121(e). [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 12:58 pm
A scanned copy of the RTI application and the response received from NCRB is at Annexure -1. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 4:01 am
Canada (Commissioner of Patents), 2003 FCA 121, [2003] 4 F.C. 67) where procedural issues arose regarding fees, on the basis that only an Application was deemed abandoned. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 7:10 am
Hollywood Fan Sites LLC, 14-CV-121 (JPO) (SDNY June 30, 2015) [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 2:17 am
The Supreme Court found the notice sufficient, holding that “substantial compliance is sufficient to satisfy the requirement of section 29-26-121(a)(3)(B)(1). [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 8:53 am
(See note 1, infra.). [read post]
21 Jun 2015, 7:37 pm
Universal Pictures Corp., 45 F.2d 119, 121 (2d Cir. 1930). [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 9:23 pm
Next time I'm in Chicago I really need to spend some time at the University of Chicago law library, with the Karl Llewellyn papers, boxes 121 and 122, which have Llewellyn contracts exams from the late 1920s to the 1940s. [read post]
